The DOI matches its Crossref record, with a small difference in title or year.
A Fault Diagnosis Method of Power Systems Based on Improved Objective Function and Genetic Algorithm-Tabu Search
Abstract
Based on the improved optimization objective function of fault diagnosis, a genetic algorithm-Tabu search (GATS) method is introduced for the purpose of fault diagnosis of power systems. The genetic algorithm has good global search ability, while the Tabu search algorithm has good local search ability. Integrating the advantages of these two algorithms, a new hybrid algorithm, called GATS, can be obtained. Using the function of Shcaffer, the advantages of GATS are proven in this paper. The results of case studies show that GATS is superior to conventional methods in terms of the sensitivity of original solution and the dependency of original parameters. The satisfactory results can be obtained when the GATS method is applied in the event of abnormal operations of protective relays and circuit breakers or the multiple-fault scenarios.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 13
- wen, 2002, A new approach to time constrained fault diagnosis using the tabu search method, Intell Syst Eng, 120, 19
- bi, 2005, improved petri net based fault diagnosis approach for power networks, Power Syst Technol, 29, 52
- 10.1109/PES.2006.1709100 · DOI
- li, 1998, hybrid strategy combining genetic algorithm and tabu search algorithm, J Syst Eng, 13, 28
- zhou, 1993, a neural network approach to fault diagnosis for power systems, Proc IEEE TENCON, 2, 885
- 10.1109/PTC.1999.826561 · DOI
- 10.1109/TPWRS.2004.836256 · DOI
- 10.1109/59.574957 · DOI
- 10.1016/0378-7796(95)00974-6 · DOI
- wen, 1994, fault section estimation in power system using genetic algorithm and simulated annealing, Proc CSEE, 14, 29
- 10.1109/59.387936 · DOI
- 10.1109/61.131123 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0954-1810(97)00006-X · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Fault Detection and Fault Diagnosis in Power System Using AI: A Review
Nasim, S. F., Aziz, S., Qaiser, A., Kulsoom, U., & Ahmed, S. (2024) · Sir Syed University Research Journal of Engineering & Technology · doi:10.33317/ssurj.598 · Cited by 17
Metadata
- Authors
- Lin, X., Ke, S., Li, Z., Weng, H., & Han, X.
- Affiliations
- Huazhong University of Science and Technology (CN)
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery
- Published
- 2010-07
- Volume
- 25
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 1268-1274
- ISSN
- 0885-8977 (ISSN-L)
- 1937-4208
- OpenAlex
- W2107303657
- Cited by
- 119
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 14
- FWCI
- 12.74
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Power Systems Fault Detection
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Power System Optimization and Stability
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality › Power System Reliability and Maintenance
- Keywords
- power system fault diagnosis, objective function optimization, circuit breaker faults, multiple faults, parameter sensitivity
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Fault Diagnosis Method of Power Systems Based on Improved Objective Function and Genetic Algorithm-Tabu Search. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/tpwrd.2010.2044590
- The paper
- Lin, X., Ke, S., Li, Z., Weng, H., & Han, X. (2010). A Fault Diagnosis Method of Power Systems Based on Improved Objective Function and Genetic Algorithm-Tabu Search. IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery. https://doi.org/10.1109/tpwrd.2010.2044590