The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Market-Clearing With Stochastic Security— Part I: Formulation
Abstract
The first of this two-paper series formulates a stochastic security-constrained multi-period electricity market-clearing problem with unit commitment. The stochastic security criterion accounts for a pre-selected set of random generator and line outages with known historical failure rates and involuntary load shedding as optimization variables. Unlike the classical deterministic reserve-constrained unit commitment, here the reserve services are determined by economically penalizing the operation of the market by the expected load not served. The proposed formulation is a stochastic programming problem that optimizes, concurrently with the pre-contingency social welfare, the expected operating costs associated with the deployment of the reserves following the contingencies. This stochastic programming formulation is solved in the second companion paper using mixed-integer linear programming methods. Two cases are presented: a small transmission-constrained three-bus network scheduled over a horizon of four hours and the IEEE Reliability Test System scheduled over 24 h. The impact on the resulting generation and reserve schedules of transmission constraints and generation ramp limits, of demand-side reserve, of the value of load not served, and of the constitution of the pre-selected set of contingencies are assessed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Benefits and challenges of electrical demand response: a critical review
O׳Connell, N., Pinson, P., Madsen, H., & O׳Malley, M. (2014) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2014.07.098 · Cited by 636
Reserve Requirements for Wind Power Integration: A Scenario-Based Stochastic Programming Framework
Papavasiliou, A., Oren, S. S., & O'Neill, R. P. (2011) · IEEE Transactions on Power Systems · doi:10.1109/tpwrs.2011.2121095 · Cited by 580
Tight and compact MILP formulation for the thermal unit commitment problem
Morales-Espana, Latorre, J. M., & Ramos, A. (2013) · IEEE Transactions on Power Systems · doi:10.1109/tpwrs.2013.2251373 · Cited by 419
Unified Stochastic and Robust Unit Commitment
Zhao, C., & Guan, Y. (2013) · IEEE Transactions on Power Systems · doi:10.1109/tpwrs.2013.2251916 · Cited by 323
Intermittency and the Value of Renewable Energy
Gowrisankaran, G., Reynolds, S. S., & Samano, M. (2016) · Journal of Political Economy · doi:10.1086/686733 · Cited by 322
Metadata
- Authors
- Bouffard, F., Galiana, F. D., & Conejo, A. J.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Power Systems
- Published
- 2005-11
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1818-1826
- ISSN
- 0885-8950 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2102161868
- Cited by
- 432
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 8.90
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Market-Clearing With Stochastic Security— Part I: Formulation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/tpwrs.2005.857016
- The paper
- Bouffard, F., Galiana, F. D., & Conejo, A. J. (2005). Market-Clearing With Stochastic Security— Part I: Formulation. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems. https://doi.org/10.1109/tpwrs.2005.857016
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.