The DOI matches its Crossref record; 18 of the 18 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Convergence Analysis of the Incremental Cost Consensus Algorithm Under Different Communication Network Topologies in a Smart Grid
Abstract
In a smart grid, effective distributed control algorithms could be embedded in distributed controllers to properly allocate electrical power among connected buses autonomously. By selecting the incremental cost of each generation unit as the consensus variable, the incremental cost consensus (ICC) algorithm is able to solve the conventional centralized economic dispatch problem in a distributed manner. The mathematical formulation of the algorithm has been presented in this paper. The results of several case studies have also been presented to show that the difference between network topologies will influence the convergence rate of the ICC algorithm.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Consensus Problems in Networks of Agents With Switching Topology and Time-Delays
Olfati-Saber, R., & Murray, R. M. (2004) · IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control · doi:10.1109/tac.2004.834113 · Cited by 12,788
Consensus and Cooperation in Networked Multi-Agent Systems
Olfati-Saber, R., Fax, J. A., & Murray, R. M. (2007) · Proceedings of the IEEE · doi:10.1109/jproc.2006.887293 · Cited by 10,522 · cited 5×
“An appropriate consensus algorithm can guarantee that all of the consensus variables converge to a common value asymptotically [12].”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialPower Generation, Operation, and Control
Wood, A. J., & Wollenberg, B. F. (1984) · Cited by 8,303
Parallel and Distributed Computation: Numerical Methods
Bertsekas, D. P., & Tsitsiklis, J. N. (1989) · DSpace@MIT (Massachusetts Institute of Technology) · Cited by 5,293
Information Flow and Cooperative Control of Vehicle Formations
Fax, J. A., & Murray, R. M. (2004) · IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control · doi:10.1109/tac.2004.834433 · Cited by 4,579
Distributed Consensus in Multi-vehicle Cooperative Control
Ren, W., & Beard, R. W. (2008) · Communications and Control Engineering · doi:10.1007/978-1-84800-015-5 · Cited by 2,826
(1996) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/3-540-61769-8 · Cited by 1,865
Particle swarm optimization to solving the economic dispatch considering the generator constraints
Gaing, Z.-L. (2003) · IEEE Transactions on Power Systems · doi:10.1109/tpwrs.2003.814889 · Cited by 1,715
The Future Renewable Electric Energy Delivery and Management (FREEDM) System: The Energy Internet
Huang, A. Q., Crow, M. L., Heydt, G. T., Zheng, J. P., & Dale, S. J. (2011) · Proceedings of the IEEE · doi:10.1109/jproc.2010.2081330 · Cited by 1,463
A survey of consensus problems in multi-agent coordination
Ren, W., Beard, R. W., & Atkins, E. M. (2005) · Proceedings of the 2005, American Control Conference, 2005. · doi:10.1109/acc.2005.1470239 · Cited by 1,344
Cited by
A survey of distributed optimization
Yang, T., Yi, X., Wu, J., Yuan, Y., Wu, D., Meng, Z., Hong, Y., Wang, H., Lin, Z., & Johansson, K. H. (2019) · Annual Reviews in Control · doi:10.1016/j.arcontrol.2019.05.006 · Cited by 913
Consensus Based Approach for Economic Dispatch Problem in a Smart Grid
Yang, S., Tan, S., & Xu, J.-X. (2013) · IEEE Transactions on Power Systems · doi:10.1109/tpwrs.2013.2271640 · Cited by 759
Metadata
- Authors
- Zhang, Z., & Chow, M.-Y.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Power Systems
- Published
- 2012-11
- Volume
- 27
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1761-1768
- ISSN
- 0885-8950 (ISSN-L)
- 1558-0679
- OpenAlex
- W2075469757
- Cited by
- 698
- References
- 18
- FWCI
- 17.91
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Convergence Analysis of the Incremental Cost Consensus Algorithm Under Different Communication Network Topologies in a Smart Grid. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/tpwrs.2012.2188912
- The paper
- Zhang, Z., & Chow, M.-Y. (2012). Convergence Analysis of the Incremental Cost Consensus Algorithm Under Different Communication Network Topologies in a Smart Grid. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems. https://doi.org/10.1109/tpwrs.2012.2188912
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
