OPF-Based CVR Operation in PV-Rich MV-LV Distribution Networks
Open accessAbstract
Conservation voltage reduction (CVR) has been traditionally applied adopting moderate settings at primary substations and when distributed generation was uncommon. However, as new infrastructure is deployed across European-style medium voltage (MV) and low voltage (LV) networks, driven by increasing photovoltaic (PV) penetration levels, the opportunity arises to develop more advanced CVR schemes. This paper proposes a centralized, three-phase AC optimal power flow (OPF)-based CVR scheme that, using monitoring, on-load tap changers and capacitors across MV and LV, actively manages voltages to minimize energy consumption, even with high PV penetration, while considering MV-LV constraints. To tackle scalability issues brought by discrete variables, a two-stage approach is proposed to solve the OPF as a non-linear programming problem (relaxing integer variables). A process that continuously checks customer voltages is adopted to trigger the optimization only when needed. Moreover, CVR benefits are not only quantified at a network level but also for customers, providing useful insights to policy makers. The proposed control is assessed using a realistic, unbalanced U.K. residential MV-LV network (2,400+ customers) with high PV penetration, and 1-min resolution time-varying profiles and load models. Results demonstrate that the proposed control effectively coordinates voltage regulation in MV and LV levels throughout the day, minimizing energy imports for all customers.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
A high share of PVs in the MV or LV network can cause voltages with magnitude higher than boundaries set by the grid code or standards.
“A high share of PVs in the MV or LV network can cause voltages with the magnitude that is higher than boundaries set by the grid code or the standards.”
From A Comprehensive Analysis of the Voltage Unbalance Factor in PV and EV Rich Non-Synthetic Low Voltage Distribution Networks (2020) · cites this paper as [6]
The supplied passages and additional passages retrieved from the indexed copy contain bibliographic information and keywords, but no discussion of PV penetration causing voltages to exceed grid-code or standards limits. Searches for overvoltage, voltage rise, and statutory limits did not find a passage addressing the claim. (LLM, conf=0.72)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
An open source platform for collaborating on smart grid research
Dugan, R. C., & McDermott, T. E. (2011) · 2011 IEEE Power and Energy Society General Meeting · doi:10.1109/pes.2011.6039829 · Cited by 533 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Antić, T., Capuder, T., & Bolfek, M. (2020) · Energies · doi:10.3390/en14010117 · Cited by 51 · see citing works
“[6] presents the optimal power flow (OPF)-based conservation voltage reduction (CVR) operation in distribution networks with the high share of PVs.”
Background
- Authors
- Gutierrez-Lagos, L., & Ochoa, L. F.
- Affiliations
- The University of Melbourne (AU)
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Power Systems
- Published
- 2019-07
- Volume
- 34
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 2778-2789
- ISSN
- 0885-8950 (ISSN-L)
- 1558-0679
- OpenAlex
- W2911957736
- Cited by
- 67
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 3
- FWCI
- 3.69
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- Licence
- Locations
- IEEE Transactions on Power Systems (publishedVersion)
- Research Explorer (The University of Manchester) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Funders
- Electricity North West, U.K.
- Ofgem's Low Carbon Networks Fund
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Optimal Power Flow Distribution
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Power System Optimization and Stability
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Smart Grid Energy Management
- Keywords
- conservation voltage reduction, optimal power flow, photovoltaic penetration, medium-voltage distribution networks, low-voltage distribution networks, voltage regulation, on-load tap changer, capacitor control, energy optimization, two-stage optimization, unbalanced distribution systems, residential distribution networks
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review