Cited by 242Power System Optimization and StabilityOptimal Power Flow DistributionSmart Grid and Power Systems

Physics-Aware Neural Networks for Distribution System State Estimation

Open access
Zamzam, Ahmed Samir, Sidiropoulos, Nicholas D.·2020·IEEE Transactions on Power Systems

Abstract

The distribution system state estimation problem seeks to determine the network state from available measurements. Widely used Gauss-Newton approaches are very sensitive to the initialization and often not suitable for real-time estimation. Learning approaches are very promising for real-time estimation, as they shift the computational burden to an offline training stage. Prior machine learning approaches to power system state estimation have been electrical model-agnostic, in the sense that they did not exploit the topology and physical laws governing the power grid to design the architecture of the learning model. In this paper, we propose a novel learning model that utilizes the structure of the power grid. The proposed neural network architecture reduces the number of coefficients needed to parameterize the mapping from the measurements to the network state by exploiting the separability of the estimation problem. This prevents overfitting and reduces the complexity of the training stage. We also propose a greedy algorithm for phasor measuring units placement that aims at minimizing the complexity of the neural network required for realizing the state estimation mapping. Simulation results show superior performance of the proposed method over the Gauss-Newton approach.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/tpwrs.2020.2988352

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • An ANN-based approach was recently discussed for a generalized neuron-based stabilizer and a multilayer perceptron for transient stability assessment.

    “An ANN-based approach was recently discussed for a generalized neuron-based stabilizer [90] and a multilayer perceptron for transient stability assessment [91].”

    From A Comprehensive Review on the Role of Artificial Intelligence in Power System Stability, Control, and Protection: Insights and Future Directions (2024) · cites this paper as [90]

    The citation [91] is attached to the multilayer-perceptron claim. The Abstract describes a physics-aware neural network for distribution-system state estimation, and the Experimental Results discuss feed-forward networks for state estimation. Searches for “transient stability assessment multilayer perceptron” and “stability assessment stabilizer transient” found no passage addressing a multilayer perceptron for transient stability assessment. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The proposed stabilizer based on generalized neurons works well under solid shocks in the single-machine infinite bus (SMIB) system.

    “The simulation results of the single-machine infinite bus (SMIB) system show that the proposed stabilizer works well under solid shocks.”

    From A Comprehensive Review on the Role of Artificial Intelligence in Power System Stability, Control, and Protection: Insights and Future Directions (2024) · cites this paper as [90]

    The Experimental Results section evaluates a neural-network method for distribution-system state estimation, while the Additional information section tests its response to corrupted µPMU measurements. Searches for SMIB, a generalized-neuron stabilizer, and solid shocks found no passage addressing the claimed simulation. (LLM, conf=0.78)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 28 · Cited by 242

Authors
Zamzam, A. S., & Sidiropoulos, N. D.
Affiliations
  • National Laboratory of the Rockies (US)
  • University of Virginia (US)
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Power Systems
Published
2020-11
Volume
35
Issue
6
Pages
4347-4356
ISSN
  • 0885-8950 (ISSN-L)
  • 1558-0679
OpenAlex
W2925104992
Cited by
242
References
28
Citations by year
2026: 43 · 2025: 35 · 2024: 45 · 2023: 53 · 2022: 28 · 2021: 24 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 3
FWCI
9.95
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • IEEE Transactions on Power Systems (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
National Science Foundation (CIF-1525194)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Power System Optimization and Stability
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Optimal Power Flow Distribution
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Smart Grid and Power Systems
Keywords
distribution system state estimation, physics-aware neural networks, power grid topology, phasor measurement unit placement, greedy algorithm, separability, overfitting reduction, real-time state estimation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review