The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.
Fault Recovery Analysis of Grid-Forming Inverters With Priority-Based Current Limiters
Open accessAbstract
Grid-forming (GFM) inverters are required to operate robustly against grid faults. However, due to the limited over-current capability of inverters, current-limiting controls are usually applied to protect these semiconductor devices, which may prevent GFM inverters from a successful fault recovery. To understand this phenomenon, this study analyzes the fault recovery process of a GFM inverter with a priority-based current limiter. According to whether the GFM inverter can ensure transient stability and exit the current-limiting mode after fault clearance, three post-fault scenarios are identified, includingnormal operation, current limitation, and oscillations. Further, the impacts of the short-circuit ratio and control parameters on the post-fault behavior of GFM inverters are demonstrated. To illustrate the implications of these theoretical results, typical numerical examples are presented. Finally, the theoretical findings are validated through experimental tests.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 30 · Cited by 131
Research works printed but not linked: 29
- 10.1109/TPWRS.2019.2892224 · DOI
- 10.1109/TPWRS.2009.2032231 · DOI
- 10.1109/TIA.2014.2345877 · DOI
- 10.1109/JESTPE.2019.2931477 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1109/TIE.2007.904022 · DOI
- 10.1049/iet-rpg.2017.0369 · DOI
- 10.2172/1721727 · DOI
- 10.1109/TIE.2021.3065614 · DOI
- 10.1109/JESTPE.2019.2959271 · DOI
- 10.1109/TPEL.2004.836685 · DOI
- giroux, 2006, Static Synchronous Compensator (STATCOM) Used for Midpoint Voltage Regulation on a 500 kV Transmission Line
- 10.23919/IPEC-Himeji2022-ECCE53331.2022.9807120 · DOI
- 10.1109/TPEL.2021.3122744 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1109/TPWRS.2016.2521325 · DOI
- 10.1109/TPWRS.2022.3173160 · DOI
- 10.1109/TPWRS.2021.3107959 · DOI
- 10.1109/TSG.2017.2749259 · DOI
- 10.1109/JESTPE.2021.3080236 · DOI
- 10.1109/JESTPE.2019.2959085 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.epsr.2020.106726 · DOI
- 10.1109/ECCE47101.2021.9595742 · DOI
- 10.1109/TPEL.2013.2279162 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.automatica.2013.05.018 · DOI
- 10.1109/JESTPE.2019.2946310 · DOI
- 10.1109/TIE.2018.2875669 · DOI
- 10.1109/TSG.2018.2866122 · DOI
- 10.1109/JESTPE.2020.3039407 · DOI
- 10.1109/OJIA.2020.3020392 · DOI
- 10.1109/OJIA.2021.3074028 · DOI
Metadata
- Authors
- Fan, B., & Wang, X.
- Affiliations
- Aalborg University (DK)
- KTH Royal Institute of Technology (SE)
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Power Systems
- Published
- 2023-11
- Volume
- 38
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 5102-5112
- ISSN
- 0885-8950 (ISSN-L)
- 1558-0679
- OpenAlex
- W4312739724
- Cited by
- 131
- References
- 30
- Citations by year
- 2026: 34 · 2025: 49 · 2024: 41 · 2023: 6
- FWCI
- 9.54
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- IEEE Transactions on Power Systems (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- VBN Forskningsportal (Aalborg Universitet) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Funders
- European Commission (HORIZON2020, 101031512)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Microgrid Control and Optimization
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Multilevel Inverters and Converters
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Power System Optimization and Stability
- Keywords
- grid-forming inverters, fault recovery, current limiting control, short-circuit ratio, transient stability, grid faults
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review