The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Assessing the Reliability and Degradation of Photovoltaic Module Performance Parameters
Abstract
Photovoltaic (PV) modules are renowned for their reliability. However, some modules degrade or even fail when operating outdoors for extended periods. To reduce the degradation, and the number of failures, extensive research is needed on the performance of PV modules. The aim of this study was to establish a photovoltaic degradation and failure assessment procedure. This procedure should assess all parameters of PV modules to completely analyze any observed degradation or failure. In this paper some degradation modes of PV modules are discussed and a procedure used to assess these degradation modes is then presented. Results obtained by subjecting Copper Indium Diselenide (CIS), single and triple junction amorphous silicon (a-Si and a-SiGe), Edge-defined Film-fed Growth (EFG) silicon and mono-crystalline silicon (mono-Si) modules to the assessment procedure are presented and discussed. Results obtained indicate that the thin-film modules degrade by up to 50% in performance after an initial outdoor exposure of 130 kWh/m/sup 2/. Visual inspection revealed that both crystalline modules had cracked cells. The mismatch due to the cracked cell in the EFG-Si module, however, was limited by the interconnect busbars. This paper accentuates the importance of characterizing all module performance parameters in order to analyze observed degradation and failure modes.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Physics of Semiconductor Devices
Sze, S. M., & Ng, K. K. (2006) · doi:10.1002/0470068329 · Cited by 14,627
Cited by
Transitioning to Physics-of-Failure as a Reliability Driver in Power Electronics
Wang, H., Liserre, M., Blaabjerg, F., de Place Rimmen, P., Jacobsen, J. B., Kvisgaard, T., & Landkildehus, J. (2014) · IEEE Journal of Emerging and Selected Topics in Power Electronics · doi:10.1109/jestpe.2013.2290282 · Cited by 693
Line–Line Fault Analysis and Protection Challenges in Solar Photovoltaic Arrays
Zhao, Y., De Palma, J.-F., Mosesian, J., Lyons, R., & Lehman, B. (2013) · Industrial Electronics, IEEE Transactions on · doi:10.1109/tie.2012.2205355 · Cited by 300
Bending cyclic load test for crystalline silicon photovoltaic modules
Suzuki, S., Doi, T., Masuda, A., & Tanahashi, T. (2018) · Japanese Journal of Applied Physics · doi:10.7567/jjap.57.02ce05 · Cited by 13
Metadata
- Authors
- Meyer, E. L., & van Dyk, E. E.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Reliability
- Published
- 2004-03
- Volume
- 53
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 83-92
- ISSN
- 0018-9529 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2149604290
- Cited by
- 378
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 4.25
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Assessing the Reliability and Degradation of Photovoltaic Module Performance Parameters. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/tr.2004.824831
- The paper
- Meyer, E. L., & van Dyk, E. E. (2004). Assessing the Reliability and Degradation of Photovoltaic Module Performance Parameters. IEEE Transactions on Reliability. https://doi.org/10.1109/tr.2004.824831
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.