The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Remaining Useful Life Estimation of Critical Components With Application to Bearings
Abstract
Prognostics activity deals with the estimation of the Remaining Useful Life (RUL) of physical systems based on their current health state and their future operating conditions. RUL estimation can be done by using two main approaches, namely model-based and data-driven approaches. The first approach is based on the utilization of physics of failure models of the degradation, while the second approach is based on the transformation of the data provided by the sensors into models that represent the behavior of the degradation. This paper deals with a data-driven prognostics method, where the RUL of the physical system is assessed depending on its critical component. Once the critical component is identified, and the appropriate sensors installed, the data provided by these sensors are exploited to model the degradation's behavior. For this purpose, Mixture of Gaussians Hidden Markov Models (MoG-HMMs), represented by Dynamic Bayesian Networks (DBNs), are used as a modeling tool. MoG-HMMs allow us to represent the evolution of the component's health condition by hidden states by using temporal or frequency features extracted from the raw signals provided by the sensors. The prognostics process is then done in two phases: a learning phase to generate the behavior model, and an exploitation phase to estimate the current health state and calculate the RUL. Furthermore, the performance of the proposed method is verified by implementing prognostics performance metrics, such as accuracy, precision, and prediction horizon. Finally, the proposed method is applied to real data corresponding to the accelerated life of bearings, and experimental results are discussed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A tutorial on hidden Markov models and selected applications in speech recognition
Rabiner, L. R. (1989) · Proceedings of the IEEE · doi:10.1109/5.18626 · Cited by 22,743
An integrated structural framework to cost-based FMECA: The priority-cost FMECA
Carmignani, G. (2009) · Reliability Engineering & System Safety · doi:10.1016/j.ress.2008.09.009 · Cited by 150
Cited by
Machinery health prognostics: A systematic review from data acquisition to RUL prediction
Lei, Y., Li, N., Guo, L., Li, N., Yan, T., & Lin, J. (2018) · Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing · doi:10.1016/j.ymssp.2017.11.016 · Cited by 2,634
Liao, L., & Köttig, F. (2016) · Applied Soft Computing · doi:10.1016/j.asoc.2016.03.013 · Cited by 258
Javed, K., Gouriveau, R., & Zerhouni, N. (2017) · Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing · doi:10.1016/j.ymssp.2017.01.050 · Cited by 217
Metadata
- Authors
- Medjaher, K., Tobon-Mejia, D. A., & Zerhouni, N.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Reliability
- Published
- 2012-06
- Volume
- 61
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 292-302
- ISSN
- 0018-9529 (ISSN-L)
- 1558-1721
- OpenAlex
- W2110221383
- Cited by
- 292
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 27.82
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Remaining Useful Life Estimation of Critical Components With Application to Bearings. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/tr.2012.2194175
- The paper
- Medjaher, K., Tobon-Mejia, D. A., & Zerhouni, N. (2012). Remaining Useful Life Estimation of Critical Components With Application to Bearings. IEEE Transactions on Reliability. https://doi.org/10.1109/tr.2012.2194175
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.