Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 292

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Remaining Useful Life Estimation of Critical Components With Application to Bearings

Medjaher, Kamal, Tobon-Mejia, Diego Alejandro, Zerhouni, Noureddine·2012·IEEE Transactions on Reliability

Abstract

Prognostics activity deals with the estimation of the Remaining Useful Life (RUL) of physical systems based on their current health state and their future operating conditions. RUL estimation can be done by using two main approaches, namely model-based and data-driven approaches. The first approach is based on the utilization of physics of failure models of the degradation, while the second approach is based on the transformation of the data provided by the sensors into models that represent the behavior of the degradation. This paper deals with a data-driven prognostics method, where the RUL of the physical system is assessed depending on its critical component. Once the critical component is identified, and the appropriate sensors installed, the data provided by these sensors are exploited to model the degradation's behavior. For this purpose, Mixture of Gaussians Hidden Markov Models (MoG-HMMs), represented by Dynamic Bayesian Networks (DBNs), are used as a modeling tool. MoG-HMMs allow us to represent the evolution of the component's health condition by hidden states by using temporal or frequency features extracted from the raw signals provided by the sensors. The prognostics process is then done in two phases: a learning phase to generate the behavior model, and an exploitation phase to estimate the current health state and calculate the RUL. Furthermore, the performance of the proposed method is verified by implementing prognostics performance metrics, such as accuracy, precision, and prediction horizon. Finally, the proposed method is applied to real data corresponding to the accelerated life of bearings, and experimental results are discussed.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/tr.2012.2194175

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 292

Metadata

Authors
Medjaher, K., Tobon-Mejia, D. A., & Zerhouni, N.
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Reliability
Published
2012-06
Volume
61
Issue
2
Pages
292-302
ISSN
  • 0018-9529 (ISSN-L)
  • 1558-1721
OpenAlex
W2110221383
Cited by
292
References
2
FWCI
27.82
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Remaining Useful Life Estimation of Critical Components With Application to Bearings. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/tr.2012.2194175
The paper
Medjaher, K., Tobon-Mejia, D. A., & Zerhouni, N. (2012). Remaining Useful Life Estimation of Critical Components With Application to Bearings. IEEE Transactions on Reliability. https://doi.org/10.1109/tr.2012.2194175

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.