The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Probabilistic pursuit-evasion games: theory, implementation, and experimental evaluation
Abstract
We consider the problem of having a team of unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) and unmanned ground vehicles (UGVs) pursue a second team of evaders while concurrently building a map in an unknown environment. We cast the problem in a probabilistic game theoretical framework, and consider two computationally feasible greedy pursuit policies: local-mar and global-max. To implement this scenario on real UAVs and UGVs, we propose a distributed hierarchical hybrid system architecture which emphasizes the autonomy of each agent, yet allows for coordinated team efforts. We describe the implementation of the architecture on a fleet of UAVs and UGVs, detailing components such as high-level pursuit policy computation, map building and interagent communication, and low-level navigation, sensing, and control. We present both simulation and experimental results of real pursuit-evasion games involving our fleet of UAVs and UGVs, and evaluate the pursuit policies relating expected capture times to the speed and intelligence of the evaders and the sensing capabilities of the pursuers.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Maximum Likelihood from Incomplete Data Via the EM Algorithm
Dempster, A. P., Laird, N. M., & Rubin, D. B. (1977) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology · doi:10.1111/j.2517-6161.1977.tb01600.x · Cited by 50,444
Multiagent systems: A survey from a machine learning perspective
Stone, P., & Veloso, M. (2000) · Autonomous Robots · doi:10.1023/a:1008942012299 · Cited by 1,218
Cited by
Cooperative Multi-agent Control Using Deep Reinforcement Learning
Gupta, J. K., Egorov, M., & Kochenderfer, M. (2017) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-71682-4_5 · Cited by 874
Real-time indoor autonomous vehicle test environment
HOW, J. P., BEHIHKE, B., FRANK, A., DALE, D., & VIAN, J. (2008) · IEEE Control Systems · doi:10.1109/mcs.2007.914691 · Cited by 409
Multi-robot target detection and tracking: taxonomy and survey
Robin, C., & Lacroix, S. (2016) · Autonomous Robots · doi:10.1007/s10514-015-9491-7 · Cited by 290
Parker, L. E., Rus, D., & Sukhatme, G. S. (2016) · Springer Handbooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-32552-1_53 · Cited by 290
Mapping Two Decades of Autonomous Vehicle Research: A Systematic Scientometric Analysis
Faisal, A., Yigitcanlar, T., Kamruzzaman, M., & Paz, A. (2021) · Journal of Urban Technology · doi:10.1080/10630732.2020.1780868 · Cited by 85
Metadata
- Authors
- Vidal, R., Shakernia, O., Kim, H. J., Shim, D. H., & Sastry, S.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Robotics and Automation
- Published
- 2002-10
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 662-669
- ISSN
- 1042-296X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2160484294
- Cited by
- 528
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 26.40
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Probabilistic pursuit-evasion games: theory, implementation, and experimental evaluation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/tra.2002.804040
- The paper
- Vidal, R., Shakernia, O., Kim, H. J., Shim, D. H., & Sastry, S. (2002). Probabilistic pursuit-evasion games: theory, implementation, and experimental evaluation. IEEE Transactions on Robotics and Automation. https://doi.org/10.1109/tra.2002.804040
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.