The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Complementary Stability and Loop Shaping for Improved Human–Robot Interaction
Abstract
Robots intended for high-force interaction with humans face particular challenges to achieve performance and stability. They require low and tunable endpoint impedance as well as high force capacity, and demand actuators with low intrinsic impedance, the ability to exhibit high impedance (relative to the human subject), and a high ratio of force to weight. Force-feedback control can be used to improve actuator performance, but causes well-known interaction stability problems. This paper presents a novel method to design actuator controllers for physically interactive machines. A loop-shaping design method is developed from a study of fundamental differences between interaction control and the more common servo problem. This approach addresses the interaction problem by redefining stability and performance, using a computational approach to search parameter spaces and displaying variations in performance as control parameters are adjusted. A measure of complementary stability is introduced, and the coupled stability problem is transformed to a robust stability problem using limited knowledge of the environment dynamics (in this case, the human). Design examples show that this new measure improves performance beyond the current best-practice stability constraint (passivity). The controller was implemented on an interactive robot, verifying stability and performance. Testing showed that the new controller out-performed a state-of-the-art controller on the same system
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Impedance Control: An Approach to Manipulation: Part I—Theory
Hogan, N. (1985) · Journal of Dynamic Systems, Measurement, and Control · doi:10.1115/1.3140702 · Cited by 3,673
Self-citation
Cited by
Kong, K., Bae, J., & Tomizuka, M. (2009) · IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics · doi:10.1109/tmech.2008.2004561 · Cited by 426
Adaptive Neural Network Control of a Robotic Manipulator With Time-Varying Output Constraints
He, W., Huang, H., & Ge, S. S. (2017) · IEEE Transactions on Cybernetics · doi:10.1109/tcyb.2017.2711961 · Cited by 361
Human–Robot Collaboration Based on Motion Intention Estimation
Li, Y., & Ge, S. S. (2014) · IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics · doi:10.1109/tmech.2013.2264533 · Cited by 320
Metadata
- Authors
- Buerger, S. P., & Hogan, N.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Robotics
- Published
- 2007-04
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 232-244
- ISSN
- 1552-3098 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2081814343
- Cited by
- 269
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 22.25
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Complementary Stability and Loop Shaping for Improved Human–Robot Interaction. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/tro.2007.892229
- The paper
- Buerger, S. P., & Hogan, N. (2007). Complementary Stability and Loop Shaping for Improved Human–Robot Interaction. IEEE Transactions on Robotics. https://doi.org/10.1109/tro.2007.892229
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.