The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Consensus-Based Decentralized Auctions for Robust Task Allocation
Open accessAbstract
This paper addresses task allocation to coordinate a fleet of autonomous vehicles by presenting two decentralized algorithms: the consensus-based auction algorithm (CBAA) and its generalization to the multi-assignment problem, i.e., the consensus-based bundle algorithm (CBBA). These algorithms utilize a market-based decision strategy as the mechanism for decentralized task selection and use a consensus routine based on local communication as the conflict resolution mechanism to achieve agreement on the winning bid values. Under reasonable assumptions on the scoring scheme, both of the proposed algorithms are proven to guarantee convergence to a conflict-free assignment, and it is shown that the converged solutions exhibit provable worst-case performance. It is also demonstrated that CBAA and CBBA produce conflict-free feasible solutions that are robust to both inconsistencies in the situational awareness across the fleet and variations in the communication network topology. Numerical experiments confirm superior convergence properties and performance when compared with existing auction-based task-allocation algorithms.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Consensus Problems in Networks of Agents With Switching Topology and Time-Delays
Olfati-Saber, R., & Murray, R. M. (2004) · IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control · doi:10.1109/tac.2004.834113 · Cited by 12,788
Cited by
Automated guided vehicle systems, state-of-the-art control algorithms and techniques
De Ryck, M., Versteyhe, M., & Debrouwere, F. (2020) · Journal of Manufacturing Systems · doi:10.1016/j.jmsy.2019.12.002 · Cited by 380
A taxonomy for task allocation problems with temporal and ordering constraints
Nunes, E., Manner, M., Mitiche, H., & Gini, M. (2017) · Robotics and Autonomous Systems · doi:10.1016/j.robot.2016.10.008 · Cited by 252
Performance Analysis of Algorithms for Coordination of Earth Observation by CubeSat Constellations
Kennedy, A. K., & Cahoy, K. L. (2017) · Journal of Aerospace Information Systems · doi:10.2514/1.i010426 · Cited by 12
Integrating Decentralized Coordination and Reactivity in MAS for Repair-Task Allocations
Hayashi, H. (2017) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-59930-4_8 · Cited by 7
Metadata
- Authors
- Choi, H.-L., Brunet, L., & How, J. P.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Robotics
- Published
- 2009-08
- Volume
- 25
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 912-926
- ISSN
- 1552-3098 (ISSN-L)
- 1941-0468
- OpenAlex
- W2142544818
- Cited by
- 1,128
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 44.86
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Consensus-Based Decentralized Auctions for Robust Task Allocation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/tro.2009.2022423
- The paper
- Choi, H.-L., Brunet, L., & How, J. P. (2009). Consensus-Based Decentralized Auctions for Robust Task Allocation. IEEE Transactions on Robotics. https://doi.org/10.1109/tro.2009.2022423
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.