The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Sensor Planning for a Symbiotic UAV and UGV System for Precision Agriculture
Abstract
We study two new informative path planning problems that are motivated by the use of aerial and ground robots in precision agriculture. The first problem, termed sampling traveling salesperson problem with neighborhoods (SAMPLINGTSPN), is motivated by scenarios in which unmanned ground vehicles (UGVs) are used to obtain time-consuming soil measurements. The input in SAMPLINGTSPN is a set of possibly overlapping disks. The objective is to choose a sampling location in each disk and a tour to visit the set of sampling locations so as to minimize the sum of the travel and measurement times. The second problem concerns obtaining the maximum number of aerial measurements using an unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) with limited energy. We study the scenario in which the two types of robots form a symbiotic system-the UAV lands on the UGV, and the UGV transports the UAV between deployment locations. This paper makes the following contributions. First, we present an O((rmax)/(rmin)) approximation algorithm for SAMPLINGTSPN, where rminand rmaxare the minimum and maximum radii of input disks. Second, we show how to model the UAV planning problem using a metric graph and formulate an orienteering instance to which a known approximation algorithm can be applied. Third, we apply the two algorithms to the problem of obtaining ground and aerial measurements in order to accurately estimate a nitrogen map of a plot. Along with theoretical results, we present results from simulations conducted using real soil data and preliminary field experiments with the UAV.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Otto, A., Agatz, N., Campbell, J., Golden, B., & Pesch, E. (2018) · Networks · doi:10.1002/net.21818 · Cited by 985
“Some optimization problems introduce constant setup-time parameters for each landing and takeoff [274].”
BackgroundInfluentialSurvey of computer vision algorithms and applications for unmanned aerial vehicles
Al-Kaff, A., Martín, D., García, F., Escalera, A. D. L., & María Armingol, J. (2018) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2017.09.033 · Cited by 246
Ghasri, M., & Maghrebi, M. (2021) · Safety Science · doi:10.1016/j.ssci.2021.105273 · Cited by 112
Air-Ground Integrated Mobile Edge Networks: A Survey
Zhang, W., Li, L., Zhang, N., Han, T., & Wang, S. (2020) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2020.3008168 · Cited by 75
An Adaptive Fault-Tolerant Control Scheme for Heterogeneous Multiagent Systems
Gong, J., Ma, Y., Jiang, B., Zhang, Y., & Guo, L. (2025) · IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics: Systems · doi:10.1109/tsmc.2024.3496717 · Cited by 25
Metadata
- Authors
- Tokekar, P., Hook, J. V., Mulla, D., & Isler, V.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Robotics
- Published
- 2016-12
- Volume
- 32
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1498-1511
- ISSN
- 1552-3098 (ISSN-L)
- 1941-0468
- OpenAlex
- W2530592706
- Cited by
- 524
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 24.19
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Sensor Planning for a Symbiotic UAV and UGV System for Precision Agriculture. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/tro.2016.2603528
- The paper
- Tokekar, P., Hook, J. V., Mulla, D., & Isler, V. (2016). Sensor Planning for a Symbiotic UAV and UGV System for Precision Agriculture. IEEE Transactions on Robotics. https://doi.org/10.1109/tro.2016.2603528
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.