The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Robot Collisions: A Survey on Detection, Isolation, and Identification
Open accessAbstract
Robot assistants and professional coworkers are becoming a commodity in domestic and industrial settings. In order to enable robots to share their workspace with humans and physically interact with them, fast and reliable handling of possible collisions on the entire robot structure is needed, along with control strategies for safe robot reaction. The primary motivation is the prevention or limitation of possible human injury due to physical contacts. In this survey paper, based on our early work on the subject, we review, extend, compare, and evaluate experimentally model-based algorithms for real-time collision detection, isolation, and identification that use only proprioceptive sensors. This covers the context-independent phases of the collision event pipeline for robots interacting with the environment, as in physical human–robot interaction or manipulation tasks. The problem is addressed for rigid robots first and then extended to the presence of joint/transmission flexibility. The basic physically motivated solution has already been applied to numerous robotic systems worldwide, ranging from manipulators and humanoids to flying robots, and even to commercial products.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Real-Time Obstacle Avoidance for Manipulators and Mobile Robots
Khatib, O. (1986) · The International Journal of Robotics Research · doi:10.1177/027836498600500106 · Cited by 7,894
Cited by
Gaz, C., Cognetti, M., Oliva, A., Robuffo Giordano, P., & De Luca, A. (2019) · IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters · doi:10.1109/lra.2019.2931248 · Cited by 323
Self-citationPhysical Human–Robot Interaction
Haddadin, S., & Croft, E. (2016) · Springer Handbooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-32552-1_69 · Cited by 263
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Haddadin, S., De Luca, A., & Albu-Schaffer, A.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Robotics
- Published
- 2017-12
- Volume
- 33
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1292-1312
- ISSN
- 1552-3098 (ISSN-L)
- 1941-0468
- OpenAlex
- W2762248135
- Cited by
- 791
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 29.44
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Robot Collisions: A Survey on Detection, Isolation, and Identification. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/tro.2017.2723903
- The paper
- Haddadin, S., De Luca, A., & Albu-Schaffer, A. (2017). Robot Collisions: A Survey on Detection, Isolation, and Identification. IEEE Transactions on Robotics. https://doi.org/10.1109/tro.2017.2723903
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.