Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 406

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 39 of the 39 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

GVINS: Tightly Coupled GNSS–Visual–Inertial Fusion for Smooth and Consistent State Estimation

Cao, Shaozu, Lu, Xiuyuan, Shen, Shaojie·2022·IEEE Transactions on Robotics

Abstract

Visual–inertial odometry (VIO) is known to suffer from drifting, especially over long-term runs. In this article, we present GVINS, a nonlinear optimization-based system that tightly fuses global navigation satellite system (GNSS) raw measurements with visual and inertial information for real-time and drift-free stateestimation. Our system aims to provide accurate global six-degree-of-freedom estimation under complex indoor–outdoor environments, where GNSS signals may be intermittent or even inaccessible. To establish the connection between global measurements and local states, a coarse-to-fine initialization procedure is proposed to efficiently calibrate the transformation online and initialize GNSS states from only a short window of measurements. The GNSS code pseudorange and Doppler shift measurements, along with visual and inertial information, are then modeled and used to constrain the system states in a factor graph framework. For complex and GNSS-unfriendly areas, the degenerate cases are discussed and carefully handled to ensure robustness. Thanks to the tightly coupled multisensor approach and system design, our system fully exploits the merits of three types of sensors and is able to seamlessly cope with the transition between indoor and outdoor environments, where satellites are lost and reacquired. We extensively evaluate the proposed system by both simulation and real-world experiments, and the results demonstrate that our system substantially suppresses the drift of the VIO and preserves the local accuracy in spite of noisy GNSS measurements. The versatility and robustness of the system are verified on large-scale data collected in challenging environments. In addition, experiments show that our system can still benefit from the presence of only one satellite, whereas at least four satellites are required for its conventional GNSS counterparts.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/tro.2021.3133730

Cites

39 of 39 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 39 references

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Takasu, 2009, Development of the low-cost RTK-GPS receiver with an open source program package RTKLIB, 1, 1

Metadata

Authors
Cao, S., Lu, X., & Shen, S.
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Robotics
Published
2022-08
Volume
38
Issue
4
Pages
2004-2021
ISSN
  • 1552-3098
  • 1941-0468
Cited by
406
References
39
Funders
Hong Kong Ph.D. Fellowship Scheme

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: GVINS: Tightly Coupled GNSS–Visual–Inertial Fusion for Smooth and Consistent State Estimation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/tro.2021.3133730
The paper
Cao, S., Lu, X., & Shen, S. (2022). GVINS: Tightly Coupled GNSS–Visual–Inertial Fusion for Smooth and Consistent State Estimation. IEEE Transactions on Robotics. https://doi.org/10.1109/tro.2021.3133730

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.