Cited by 10Advanced Authentication Protocols SecurityUser Authentication and Security SystemsBiometric Identification and Security

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 17 of the 17 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

On Using a Von Neumann Extractor in Heart-Beat-Based Security

Seepers, Robert Mark, Strydis, Christos, Sourdis, Ioannis, De Zeeuw, Chris Innocentius·2015·2015 IEEE Trustcom/BigDataSE/ISPA

Abstract

The Inter-Pulse-Interval (IPI) of heart beats has previously been suggested for facilitating security in mobile health (mHealth) applications. In heart-beat-based security, a security key is derived from the time difference between consecutive heart beats. As two entities that simultaneously sample the same heart beats may generate the same key (with some inter-key disparity), these keys may be used for various security functions, such as entity authentication or data confidentiality. One of the key limitations in heart-beat-based security is the low randomness intrinsic to the most-significant bits (MSBs) in the digital representation of each IPI. In this paper, we explore the use of a von Neumann entropy extractor on these MSBs in order to increase their randomness. We show that our von Neumann key-generator produces significantly more random bits than a non-extracting key generator with an average bit-extraction rate between 13.4% and 21.9%. Despite this increase in randomness, we also find a substantial increase in inter-key disparity, increasing the mismatch tolerance required for a given true-key pair. Accordingly, the maximum-attainable effective key-strength of our key generator is only slightly higher than that of a non-extracting generator (16.4 bits compared to 15.2 bits of security for a 60-bit key), while the former requires an increase in average key-generation time of 2.5x.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/trustcom.2015.411

Cites

17 of 17 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 17 references

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. 10.1145/584091.584093 · DOI
  2. von neumann, 1951, Various techniques used in connection with random digits, Monte Carlo Method National Bureau of Standards Applied Math, 36

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 10

Metadata

Authors
Seepers, R. M., Strydis, C., Sourdis, I., & De Zeeuw, C. I.
Affiliations
  • Erasmus MC (NL)
  • Chalmers University of Technology (SE)
Venue
2015 IEEE Trustcom/BigDataSE/ISPA
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2015-08
Pages
491-498
OpenAlex
W4247436492
Cited by
10
References
17
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1
FWCI
0.74
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • IEEE International Conference on Trust, Security and Privacy in Computing and Communications (TrustCom) (publishedVersion)
  • EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (submittedVersion)
  • Chalmers Research (Chalmers University of Technology) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Advanced Authentication Protocols Security
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › User Authentication and Security Systems
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Signal Processing › Biometric Identification and Security
Keywords
von Neumann extractor, interpulse interval, randomness extraction, entity authentication, key strength

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: On Using a Von Neumann Extractor in Heart-Beat-Based Security. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/trustcom.2015.411
The paper
Seepers, R. M., Strydis, C., Sourdis, I., & De Zeeuw, C. I. (2015). On Using a Von Neumann Extractor in Heart-Beat-Based Security. 2015 IEEE Trustcom/BigDataSE/ISPA. https://doi.org/10.1109/trustcom.2015.411