Cited by 76Security and Verification in ComputingDigital Rights Management and SecurityIoT and Edge/Fog Computing

Secure and Trusted Execution: Past, Present, and Future - A Critical Review in the Context of the Internet of Things and Cyber-Physical Systems

Shepherd, Carlton, Arfaoui, Ghada, Gurulian, Iakovos, Lee, Robert P., Markantonakis, Konstantinos, Akram, Raja Naeem, Sauveron, Damien, Conchon, Emmanuel·2016·2016 IEEE Trustcom/BigDataSE/ISPA

Abstract

Notions like security, trust, and privacy are crucial in the digital environment and in the future, with the advent of technologies like the Internet of Things (IoT) and Cyber-Physical Systems (CPS), their importance is only going to increase. Trust has different definitions, some situations rely on real-world relationships between entities while others depend on robust technologies to gain trust after deployment. In this paper we focus on these robust technologies, their evolution in past decades and their scope in the near future. The evolution of robust trust technologies has involved diverse approaches, as a consequence trust is defined, understood and ascertained differently across heterogeneous domains and technologies. In this paper we look at digital trust technologies from the point of view of security and examine how they are making secure computing an attainable reality. The paper also revisits and analyses the Trusted Platform Module (TPM), Secure Elements (SE), Hypervisors and Virtualisation, Intel TXT, Trusted Execution Environments (TEE) like GlobalPlatform TEE, Intel SGX, along with Host Card Emulation, and Encrypted Execution Environment (E3). In our analysis we focus on these technologies and their application to the emerging domains of the IoT and CPS.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/trustcom.2016.0060

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • TEE offers a tamper-resistant processing environment, running in a separate kernel, providing an acceptable level of originality, integrity, and confidentiality for the data and code to be executed.

    “TEE offers a tamper-resistant processing environment, running in a separate kernel providing an acceptable level of originality, integrity, and confidentiality for the data and code to be executed [12,15,16].”
  • TEE provides a hardware-assisted, fully isolated execution environment that is deemed the core of confidential computing.

    “Hardware vendors, such as Intel, AMD, and ARM, have come forward with Trusted Execution Environment (TEE) [15] technology that provides a hardware-assisted, fully isolated execution environment that is deemed as the core of confidential computing.”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Shepherd, C., Arfaoui, G., Gurulian, I., Lee, R. P., Markantonakis, K., Akram, R. N., Sauveron, D., & Conchon, E.
Affiliations
  • University of London (GB)
  • Orange (France) (FR)
  • Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
Venue
2016 IEEE Trustcom/BigDataSE/ISPA
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2016-08
Pages
168-177
OpenAlex
W2586942681
Cited by
76
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 6 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 5
FWCI
4.49
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • IEEE International Conference on Trust, Security and Privacy in Computing and Communications (TrustCom) (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Government of the United Kingdom
  • Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Security and Verification in Computing
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Digital Rights Management and Security
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › IoT and Edge/Fog Computing
Keywords
trusted execution environments, Internet of Things, cyber-physical systems, Trusted Platform Module, secure elements, hypervisor, virtualization, Intel SGX, hardware security, digital trust, secure computation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review