The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Fair and Transparent Blockchain Based Tendering Framework - A Step Towards Open Governance
Open accessAbstract
At a time when society is in constant transition to keep up with technological advancement, we are seeing traditional paradigms being increasingly challenged. The fundamentals of governance are one such paradigm. As society's values have shifted, so have expectations of government shifted from the traditional model to something commonly referred to as `open governance'. Though a disputed term, we take open governance to mean a concept, which encourages and facilitates openness, accountability, and responsiveness to citizens. For the success of open governance initiatives, there are some technologies, such as the internet, that are crucial. These technologies enable access to both the data and to engagement activities between citizens and government. There are also other technologies, like blockchain and smart contacts, which could be utilised to assist open governance. A sound starting point would be moving from a system where information is tediously released by a government, on an `as they please' basis, to an infrastructure where critical actions are captured with strong integrity, non-repudiation and evidential guarantees. With an added dimension that facilitates these actions record be accessible to public scrutiny in near real-time. One candidate technology for capturing such actions is blockchain. Initially, blockchains were mainly used to facilitate cryptocurrencies as a record of transactions. The notable example being bitcoin. However, in recent years, blockchains utility is being recognised through smart contracts - potentially a vital building block to realising open and transparent government activities. In this paper, we employ the concept of smart contracts to government tendering activities. The proposed scheme is based on smart contracts, enabling a fair, transparent and independently verifiable (auditable) government tendering scheme. The scheme is then implemented on the Ethereum platform to evaluate the performance and financial cost implications, along with an evaluation of the potential security and auditability challenges.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“In this direction, [118] proposed a multi-party protocol for constructing the public parameters of the Pinocchio zk-SNARK [95], which is the baseline for Zcash [17].”
From Privacy-Preserving Solutions for Blockchain: Review and Challenges (2019) · cites this paper as [118]
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 9
- 10.1016/j.giq.2010.07.002 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.giq.2006.06.005 · DOI
- daemen, 2013, The Design of RIJNDAEL AES-The Advanced Encryption Standard
- menezes, 2012, Elliptic Curve Public Key Cryptosystems, 234
- 10.1145/2384716.2384723 · DOI
- 10.1145/2976749.2978341 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1468-0491.2010.01498.x · DOI
- wood, 2014, Ethereum: A secure decentralised generalised transaction ledger, Ethereum Project Yellow Paper, 151, 1
- 10.2307/1598993 · DOI
Cited by
Privacy-Preserving Solutions for Blockchain: Review and Challenges
Bernal Bernabe, J., Canovas, J. L., Hernandez-Ramos, J. L., Torres Moreno, R., & Skarmeta, A. (2019) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2019.2950872 · Cited by 459
“Ethereum is also considered by [196] to build a verifiable government tendering scheme based on smart contracts and traditional cryptographic schemes.”
BackgroundFrom Public E-Procurement 3.0 to E-Procurement 4.0; A Critical Literature Review
Mavidis, A., & Folinas, D. (2022) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su141811252 · Cited by 45
Analysis of the Impact of Blockchain and Internet of Things (BIoT) on Public Procurement
Mircea, M., Stoica, M., & Ghilic-Micu, B. (2022) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2022.3182656 · Cited by 31
Metadata
- Authors
- Hardwick, F. S., Akram, R. N., & Markantonakis, K.
- Affiliations
- University of London (GB)
- Venue
- 2018 17th IEEE International Conference On Trust, Security And Privacy In Computing And Communications/ 12th IEEE International Conference On Big Data Science And Engineering (TrustCom/BigDataSE)
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2018-08
- Pages
- 1342-1347
- OpenAlex
- W2803900723
- Cited by
- 48
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 1
- FWCI
- 3.73
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- IEEE International Conference on Trust, Security and Privacy in Computing and Communications (TrustCom) (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Funders
- Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EP/N028295/1, EP/N028058/1)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Blockchain Technology Applications and Security
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Public Procurement and Policy
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › E-Government and Public Services
- Keywords
- open governance, smart contracts, blockchain, Ethereum, transparency, auditability, public procurement, non-repudiation, citizen participation, blockchain security
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Fair and Transparent Blockchain Based Tendering Framework - A Step Towards Open Governance. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/trustcom/bigdatase.2018.00185
- The paper
- Hardwick, F. S., Akram, R. N., & Markantonakis, K. (2018). Fair and Transparent Blockchain Based Tendering Framework - A Step Towards Open Governance. 2018 17th IEEE International Conference On Trust, Security And Privacy In Computing And Communications/ 12th IEEE International Conference On Big Data Science And Engineering (TrustCom/BigDataSE). https://doi.org/10.1109/trustcom/bigdatase.2018.00185