Source localization in reverberant environments: modeling and statistical analysis
Abstract
Room reverberation is typically the main obstacle for designing robust microphone-based source localization systems. The purpose of the paper is to analyze the achievable performance of acoustical source localization methods when room reverberation is present. To facilitate the analysis, we apply well known results from room acoustics to develop a simple but useful statistical model for the room transfer function. The properties of the statistical model are found to correlate well with results from real data measurements. The room transfer function model is further applied to analyze the statistical properties of some existing methods for source localization. In this respect we consider especially the asymptotic error variance and the probability of an anomalous estimate. A noteworthy outcome of the analysis is that the so-called PHAT time-delay estimator is shown to be optimal among a class of cross-correlation based time-delay estimators. To verify our results on the error variance and the outlier probability we apply the image method for simulation of the room transfer function.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Not much comparison has been made between correlation and system-identification-based algorithms for TDE performance in reverberant environments.
“A great deal of efforts have been devoted to analyzing the TDEperformance of the GCC technique in reverberant environments [66, 67]; but not much comparison has been made between correlation and system-identification-based algorithms.”
From Time Delay Estimation in Room Acoustic Environments: An Overview (2006) · cites this paper as [67]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 27 · Cited by 164
- Authors
- Gustafsson, T., Rao, B. D., & Trivedi, M.
- Affiliations
- University of California San Diego (US)
- ORCID
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Speech and Audio Processing
- Published
- 2003-11
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 791-803
- ISSN
- 1063-6676 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2146053319
- Cited by
- 164
- References
- 27
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 15
- FWCI
- 7.77
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- IEEE Transactions on Speech and Audio Processing (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Signal Processing › Speech and Audio Processing
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Signal Processing › Direction-of-Arrival Estimation Techniques
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Signal Processing › Music and Audio Processing
- Keywords
- source localization, room reverberation, statistical models, microphone array, time delay estimation, method of images, room acoustics
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review