The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Unified Collaborative and Content-Based Web Service Recommendation
Abstract
The last decade has witnessed a tremendous growth of web services as a major technology for sharing data, computing resources, and programs on the web. With increasing adoption and presence of web services, designing novel approaches for efficient and effective web service recommendation has become of paramount importance. Most existing web service discovery and recommendation approaches focus on either perishing UDDI registries, or keyword-dominant web service search engines, which possess many limitations such as poor recommendation performance and heavy dependence on correct and complex queries from users. It would be desirable for a system to recommend web services that align with users’ interests without requiring the users to explicitly specify queries. Recent research efforts on web service recommendation center on two prominent approaches:collaborative filteringandcontent-based recommendation. Unfortunately, both approaches have some drawbacks, which restrict their applicability in web service recommendation. In this paper, we propose a novel approach that unifies collaborative filtering and content-based recommendations. In particular, our approach considers simultaneously both rating data (e.g., QoS) and semantic content data (e.g., functionalities) of web services using a probabilistic generative model. In our model, unobservable user preferences are represented by introducing a set of latent variables, which can be statistically estimated. To verify the proposed approach, we conduct experiments using 3,693 real-world web services. The experimental results show that our approach outperforms the state-of-the-art methods on recommendation performance.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Item-based collaborative filtering recommendation algorithms
Sarwar, B., Karypis, G., Konstan, J., & Riedl, J. (2001) · Proceedings of the 10th international conference on World Wide Web · doi:10.1145/371920.372071 · Cited by 9,135
Cited by
Personalized Recommendation System Based on Collaborative Filtering for IoT Scenarios
Cui, Z., Xu, X., Xue, F., Cai, X., Cao, Y., Zhang, W., & Chen, J. (2020) · IEEE Transactions on Services Computing · doi:10.1109/tsc.2020.2964552 · Cited by 543
Tarus, J. K., Niu, Z., & Yousif, A. (2017) · Future Generation Computer Systems · doi:10.1016/j.future.2017.02.049 · Cited by 284
On recommendation of learning objects using Felder–Silverman learning style model
Nafea, S. M., Siewe, F., & He, Y. (2019) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2019.2935417 · Cited by 75
Metadata
- Authors
- Yao, L., Sheng, Q. Z., Ngu, A. H. H., Yu, J., & Segev, A.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Services Computing
- Published
- 2015-05-01
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 453-466
- ISSN
- 1939-1374 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1981520019
- Cited by
- 198
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 36.06
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Unified Collaborative and Content-Based Web Service Recommendation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/tsc.2014.2355842
- The paper
- Yao, L., Sheng, Q. Z., Ngu, A. H. H., Yu, J., & Segev, A. (2015). Unified Collaborative and Content-Based Web Service Recommendation. IEEE Transactions on Services Computing. https://doi.org/10.1109/tsc.2014.2355842
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.