The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A Domain Strategy for Computer Program Testing
Abstract
This paper presents a testing strategy desiged to detect errors in the control flow of a computer program, and the conditions under which this strategy is reliable are given and characterized. The control flow statements in a computer progam partition the input space into a set of mutually exclusive domains, each of which corresponds to a particular program path and consists of input data points which cause that path to be executed. The testing strategy generates test points to examine the boundaries of a domain to detect whether a domain error has occurred, as either one or more of these boundaries will have shifted or else the corresponding predicate relational operator has changed. If test points can be chosen within e of each boundary, under the appropriate assumptions, the strategy is shown to be reliable in detecting domain errons of magnitude greater than ∈. Moreover, the number of test points required to test each domain grows only linearly with both the dimensionality of the input space and the number of predicates along the path being tested.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Software unit test coverage and adequacy
Zhu, H., Hall, P. A. V., & May, J. H. R. (1997) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/267580.267590 · Cited by 1,247
Constraint-based automatic test data generation
DeMilli, R. A., & Offutt, A. J. (1991) · IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering · doi:10.1109/32.92910 · Cited by 804
An orchestrated survey of methodologies for automated software test case generation
Anand, S., Burke, E. K., Chen, T. Y., Clark, J., Cohen, M. B., Grieskamp, W., Harman, M., Harrold, M. J., McMinn, P., Bertolino, A., et al. (2013) · Journal of Systems and Software · doi:10.1016/j.jss.2013.02.061 · Cited by 668
On testing non-testable programs
Weyuker, E. J. (1982) · The Computer Journal · doi:10.1093/comjnl/25.4.465 · Cited by 606
Weak Mutation Testing and Completeness of Test Sets
Howden, W. E. (1982) · IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering · doi:10.1109/tse.1982.235571 · Cited by 477
Metadata
- Authors
- White, L. J., & Cohen, E. I.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering
- Published
- 1980-05
- Volume
- SE-6
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 247-257
- ISSN
- 0098-5589 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2130274814
- Cited by
- 378
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 28.44
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Domain Strategy for Computer Program Testing. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/tse.1980.234486
- The paper
- White, L. J., & Cohen, E. I. (1980). A Domain Strategy for Computer Program Testing. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering. https://doi.org/10.1109/tse.1980.234486
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.