The DOI matches its Crossref record.
CCFinder: a multilinguistic token-based code clone detection system for large scale source code
Open accessAbstract
A code clone is a code portion in source files that is identical or similar to another. Since code clones are believed to reduce the maintainability of software, several code clone detection techniques and tools have been proposed. This paper proposes a new clone detection technique, which consists of the transformation of input source text and a token-by-token comparison. For its implementation with several useful optimization techniques, we have developed a tool, named CCFinder (Code Clone Finder), which extracts code clones in C, C++, Java, COBOL and other source files. In addition, metrics for the code clones have been developed. In order to evaluate the usefulness of CCFinder and metrics, we conducted several case studies where we applied the new tool to the source code of JDK, FreeBSD, NetBSD, Linux, and many other systems. As a result, CCFinder has effectively found clones and the metrics have been able to effectively identify the characteristics of the systems. In addition, we have compared the proposed technique with other clone detection techniques.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 21
- Baker, A Program for Identifying Duplicated Code, 24, 49
- 10.1109/WCRE.1995.514697 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1109/METRIC.1999.809750 · doi:10.1109/metric.1999.809750
- 10.1109/WCRE.1999.806971 · DOI
- 10.1109/ICSM.1998.738528 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1109/ICSM.1999.792593 · DOI · Paper page
- 2002, FreeBSD
- 2002, Gnu Project
- 10.1017/CBO9780511574931 · DOI · Paper page
- Johnson, Identifying Redundancy in Source Code Using Fingerprints, 171
- 10.1109/ICSM.1994.336783 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0164-1212(98)10008-0 · doi:10.1016/s0164-1212(98)10008-0
- 10.1007/bf00126960 · DOI
- 10.1109/ICSM.1997.624264 · DOI · Paper page
- 2002, Linux Online
- 10.1109/ICSM.1996.565012 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1109/METRIC.2002.1011328 · DOI
- 2002, NetBSD Project
- 2002, OpenOffice.org Source Project
- Takabayashi, The Detection of Fault-Prone Program Using a NeuralNetwork, 81
- 2002, The Source for Java Technology
Cited by
DECKARD: Scalable and Accurate Tree-Based Detection of Code Clones
Jiang, L., Misherghi, G., Su, Z., & Glondu, S. (2007) · 29th International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE'07) · doi:10.1109/icse.2007.30 · Cited by 1,039
Maintaining mental models: a study of developer work habits
LaToza, T. D., Venolia, G., & DeLine, R. (2006) · Proceedings of the 28th international conference on Software engineering · doi:10.1145/1134285.1134355 · Cited by 628
Roy, C. K., & Cordy, J. R. (2008) · 2008 16th IEEE International Conference on Program Comprehension · doi:10.1109/icpc.2008.41 · Cited by 533
Managing technical debt in software-reliant systems
Brown, N., Cai, Y., Guo, Y., Kazman, R., Kim, M., Kruchten, P., Lim, E., MacCormack, A., Nord, R., Ozkaya, I., et al. (2010) · Proceedings of the FSE/SDP workshop on Future of software engineering research · doi:10.1145/1882362.1882373 · Cited by 432
GPLAG: detection of software plagiarism by program dependence graph analysis
Liu, C., Chen, C., Han, J., & Yu, P. S. (2006) · Proceedings of the 12th ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining · doi:10.1145/1150402.1150522 · Cited by 422
Metadata
- Authors
- Kamiya, T., Kusumoto, S., & Inoue, K.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering
- Published
- 2002-07
- Volume
- 28
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 654-670
- ISSN
- 0098-5589 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-3520
- 2326-3881
- OpenAlex
- W2138756793
- Cited by
- 1,711
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 85.77
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: CCFinder: a multilinguistic token-based code clone detection system for large scale source code. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/tse.2002.1019480
- The paper
- Kamiya, T., Kusumoto, S., & Inoue, K. (2002). CCFinder: a multilinguistic token-based code clone detection system for large scale source code. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering. https://doi.org/10.1109/tse.2002.1019480
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.