Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 672

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Classifying Software Changes: Clean or Buggy?

Kim, Sunghun, Whitehead,, E. James, Zhang, Yi·2008·IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering

Abstract

This paper introduces a new technique for finding latent software bugs called change classification. Change classification uses a machine learning classifier to determine whether a new software change is more similar to prior buggy changes, or clean changes. In this manner, change classification predicts the existence of bugs in software changes. The classifier is trained using features (in the machine learning sense) extracted from the revision history of a software project, as stored in its software configuration management repository. The trained classifier can classify changes as buggy or clean with 78% accuracy and 65% buggy change recall (on average). Change classification has several desirable qualities: (1) the prediction granularity is small (a change to a single file), (2) predictions do not require semantic information about the source code, (3) the technique works for a broad array of project types and programming languages, and (4) predictions can be made immediately upon completion of a change. Contributions of the paper include a description of the change classification approach, techniques for extracting features from source code and change histories, a characterization of the performance of change classification across 12 open source projects, and evaluation of the predictive power of different groups of features.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/tse.2007.70773

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Cited by

See all 672

Metadata

Authors
Kim, S., Whitehead, & Zhang, Y.
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering
Published
2008-03
Volume
34
Issue
2
Pages
181-196
ISSN
  • 0098-5589 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-3520
  • 2326-3881
OpenAlex
W2150874999
Cited by
672
References
3
FWCI
58.02
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Classifying Software Changes: Clean or Buggy? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/tse.2007.70773
The paper
Kim, S., Whitehead, & Zhang, Y. (2008). Classifying Software Changes: Clean or Buggy? IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering. https://doi.org/10.1109/tse.2007.70773

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.