The DOI matches its Crossref record; 72 of the 72 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
MAHAKIL: Diversity Based Oversampling Approach to Alleviate the Class Imbalance Issue in Software Defect Prediction
Abstract
Highly imbalanced data typically make accurate predictions difficult. Unfortunately, software defect datasets tend to have fewer defective modules than non-defective modules. Synthetic oversampling approaches address this concern by creating new minority defective modules to balance the class distribution before a model is trained. Notwithstanding the successes achieved by these approaches, they mostly result in over-generalization (high rates of false alarms) and generate near-duplicated data instances (less diverse data). In this study, we introduce MAHAKIL, a novel and efficient synthetic oversampling approach for software defect datasets that is based on the chromosomal theory of inheritance. Exploiting this theory, MAHAKIL interprets two distinct sub-classes as parents and generates a new instance that inherits different traits from each parent and contributes to the diversity within the data distribution. We extensively compare MAHAKIL with SMOTE, Borderline-SMOTE, ADASYN, Random Oversampling and the No sampling approach using 20 releases of defect datasets from the PROMISE repository and five prediction models. Our experiments indicate that MAHAKIL improves the prediction performance for all the models and achieves better and more significant pf values than the other oversampling approaches, based on Brunner's statistical significance test and Cliff's effect sizes. Therefore, MAHAKIL is strongly recommended as an efficient alternative for defect prediction models built on highly imbalanced datasets.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing
R Core Team (2025) · doi:10.32614/r.manuals · Cited by 352,181
Breiman, L. (2001) · Machine Learning · doi:10.1023/a:1010933404324 · Cited by 133,538
SMOTE synthetic minority over-sampling technique
Chawla, N. V., Bowyer, K. W., Hall, L. O., & Kegelmeyer, W. P. (2002) · Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research · doi:10.1613/jair.953 · Cited by 32,865
(1992) · Cited by 23,431
Classification and Regression by randomForest
Liaw, A. I., & Wiener, M. C. (2007) · Cited by 18,594
Nearest neighbor pattern classification
Cover, T., & Hart, P. (1967) · IEEE Transactions on Information Theory · doi:10.1109/tit.1967.1053964 · Cited by 16,936
He, H., & Garcia, E. A. (2009) · IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering · doi:10.1109/tkde.2008.239 · Cited by 10,359
On the generalized distance in statistics
Mahalanobis, P. C. (1936) · DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) · Cited by 6,068
Jost, L. (2006) · Oikos · doi:10.1111/j.2006.0030-1299.14714.x · Cited by 4,669
ADASYN: Adaptive synthetic sampling approach for imbalanced learning
He, H., Bai, Y., Garcia, E. A., & Li, S. (2008) · 2008 IEEE International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IEEE World Congress on Computational Intelligence) · doi:10.1109/ijcnn.2008.4633969 · Cited by 4,521
Cited by
A Comparative Study of Class Rebalancing Methods for Security Bug Report Classification
Zheng, W., Xun, Y., Wu, X., Deng, Z., Chen, X., & Sui, Y. (2021) · IEEE Transactions on Reliability · doi:10.1109/tr.2021.3118026 · Cited by 85
(2023) · doi:10.1109/ase56229.2023.00157 · Cited by 14
Metadata
- Authors
- Bennin, K. E., Keung, J., Phannachitta, P., Monden, A., & Mensah, S.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering
- Published
- 2018-06-01
- Volume
- 44
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 534-550
- ISSN
- 0098-5589 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-3520
- OpenAlex
- W4245807786
- Cited by
- 298
- References
- 72
- FWCI
- 46.36
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: MAHAKIL: Diversity Based Oversampling Approach to Alleviate the Class Imbalance Issue in Software Defect Prediction. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/tse.2017.2731766
- The paper
- Bennin, K. E., Keung, J., Phannachitta, P., Monden, A., & Mensah, S. (2018). MAHAKIL: Diversity Based Oversampling Approach to Alleviate the Class Imbalance Issue in Software Defect Prediction. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering. https://doi.org/10.1109/tse.2017.2731766
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.