The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Achieving Optimality and Fairness in Autonomous Demand Response: Benchmarks and Billing Mechanisms
Abstract
Autonomous demand response (DR) programs are scalable and result in a minimal control overhead on utilities. The idea is to equip each user with an energy consumption scheduling (ECS) device to automatically control the user's flexible load to minimize his energy expenditure, based on the updated electricity pricing information. While most prior works on autonomous DR have focused on coordinating the operation of ECS devices in order to achieve various system-wide goals, such as minimizing the total cost of generation or minimizing the peak-to-average ratio in the load demand, they fall short addressing the important issue of fairness. That is, while they usually guarantee optimality, they do not assure that the participating users are rewarded according to their contributions in achieving the overall system's design objectives. Similarly, they do not address the important problem of co-existence when only a sub-set of users participate in a deployed autonomous DR program. In this paper, we seek to tackle these shortcomings and design new autonomous DR systems that can achieve both optimality and fairness. In this regard, we first develop a centralized DR system to serve as a benchmark. Then, we develop a smart electricity billing mechanism that can enforce both optimality and fairness in autonomous DR systems in a decentralized fashion.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Zhu, Z., Tang, J., Lambotharan, S., Chin, W. H., & Fan, Z. (2011) · 2011 IEEE GLOBECOM Workshops (GC Wkshps) · doi:10.1109/glocomw.2011.6162372 · Cited by 157
Cited by
Energy-Sharing Model With Price-Based Demand Response for Microgrids of Peer-to-Peer Prosumers
Liu, N., Yu, X., Wang, C., Li, C., Ma, L., & Lei, J. (2017) · IEEE Transactions on Power Systems · doi:10.1109/tpwrs.2017.2649558 · Cited by 855
Integrated Demand Side Management Game in Smart Energy Hubs
Sheikhi, A., Rayati, M., Bahrami, S., & Mohammad Ranjbar, A. (2015) · IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid · doi:10.1109/tsg.2014.2377020 · Cited by 274
Esther, B. P., & Kumar, K. S. (2016) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2015.12.282 · Cited by 264
Metadata
- Authors
- Baharlouei, Z., Hashemi, M., Narimani, H., & Mohsenian-Rad, H.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid
- Published
- 2013-06
- Volume
- 4
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 968-975
- ISSN
- 1949-3053 (ISSN-L)
- 1949-3061
- OpenAlex
- W2029951115
- Cited by
- 176
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 11.38
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Achieving Optimality and Fairness in Autonomous Demand Response: Benchmarks and Billing Mechanisms. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/tsg.2012.2228241
- The paper
- Baharlouei, Z., Hashemi, M., Narimani, H., & Mohsenian-Rad, H. (2013). Achieving Optimality and Fairness in Autonomous Demand Response: Benchmarks and Billing Mechanisms. IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid. https://doi.org/10.1109/tsg.2012.2228241
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.