The DOI matches its Crossref record; 46 of the 46 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Model-Free Real-Time EV Charging Scheduling Based on Deep Reinforcement Learning
Open accessAbstract
Driven by the recent advances in electric vehicle (EV) technologies, EVs have become important for smart grid economy. When EVs participate in demand response program which has real-time pricing signals, the charging cost can be greatly reduced by taking full advantage of these pricing signals. However, it is challenging to determine an optimal charging strategy due to the existence of randomness in traffic conditions, user's commuting behavior, and the pricing process of the utility. Conventional model-based approaches require a model of forecast on the uncertainty and optimization for the scheduling process. In this paper, we formulate this scheduling problem as a Markov Decision Process (MDP) with unknown transition probability. A model-free approach based on deep reinforcement learning is proposed to determine the optimal strategy for this problem. The proposed approach can adaptively learn the transition probability and does not require any system model information. The architecture of the proposed approach contains two networks: a representation network to extract discriminative features from the electricity prices and a Q network to approximate the optimal action-value function. Numerous experimental results demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed approach.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“For load monitoring and electric vehicle charging scheduling, transfer learning [200] and deep reinforcement learning [215] methods are proposed.”
From Empowering things with intelligence: a survey of the progress, challenges, and opportunities in artificial intelligence of things (2021) · cites this paper as [215]
Citations
Cites
Human-level control through deep reinforcement learning
Mnih, V., Kavukcuoglu, K., Silver, D., Rusu, A. A., Veness, J., Bellemare, M. G., Graves, A., Riedmiller, M., Fidjeland, A. K., Ostrovski, G., et al. (2015) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature14236 · Cited by 30,357
Reinforcement Learning: An Introduction
Sutton, R. S., & Barto, A. G. (1998) · IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks · doi:10.1109/tnn.1998.712192 · Cited by 27,225
Approximation by superpositions of a sigmoidal function
Cybenko, G. (1989) · Mathematics of Control, Signals, and Systems · doi:10.1007/bf02551274 · Cited by 13,883
Continuous control with deep reinforcement learning
Lillicrap, T. P., Hunt, J. J., Pritzel, A., Heess, N., Erez, T., Tassa, Y., Silver, D., & Wierstra, D. (2015) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1509.02971 · Cited by 10,782
Greff, K., Srivastava, R. K., Koutnik, J., Steunebrink, B. R., & Schmidhuber, J. (2017) · IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems · doi:10.1109/tnnls.2016.2582924 · Cited by 6,955
Backpropagation through time: what it does and how to do it
Werbos, P. J. (1990) · Proceedings of the IEEE · doi:10.1109/5.58337 · Cited by 4,879
A Critical Review of Recurrent Neural Networks for Sequence LearningPreprint
Lipton, Z. C., Berkowitz, J. A., & Elkan, C. (2015) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1506.00019 · Cited by 3,159
Short-Term Residential Load Forecasting Based on LSTM Recurrent Neural Network
Kong, W., Dong, Z. Y., Jia, Y., Hill, D. J., Xu, Y. H., & Zhang, Y. (2017) · IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid · doi:10.1109/tsg.2017.2753802 · Cited by 2,806
Practical Recommendations for Gradient-Based Training of Deep Architectures
Bengio, Y. (2012) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-35289-8_26 · Cited by 2,259
LeCun, Y., Bottou, L., Orr, G., & Müller, K. (1998) · neural information processing systems · Cited by 1,333
Research works printed but not linked: 5
- bellman, 1958, Dynamic Programming
- 2018, Grid-Connected Renewable Energy Systems
- goodfellow, 2016, Deep Learning, 1
- 2017, The Egallon How Much Cheaper is it to Drive on Electricity?
- 2017, California Independent System Operator
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 501–547 of 547
Abdullah, H. M., Gastli, A., Ben‐Brahim, L., & Islam, S. (2026) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su18062737
Gopinathan, N., & Shanmugam, P. K. (2026) · Energy Reports · doi:10.1016/j.egyr.2026.109238
Bi-level Online Framework for Dynamic Energy Coordination and Priority-Based Charging in EV Stations
Xiong, H., Huang, J., & Lu, H. (2025) · Asian Conference on Frontiers of Power and Energy (ACFPE) · doi:10.1109/acfpe67232.2025.11451102
“In [11], a multi-agent DRL algorithm controls energy flows within EV infrastructure, optimizing resource utilization at charging points, while [12] presents a model-free, real-time scheduling via DRL-driven charging coordination.”
Real-Time Balancing Control of Reconfigurable Battery Packs Using Reinforcement Learning
Irshayyid, A., Yang, W., & Chen, J. S. (2026) · IEEE Transactions on Transportation Electrification · doi:10.1109/tte.2026.3681552
“For example, DRL has been applied to online optimization of building energy management systems [31], tra ffi c flow control [29], EV energy management strategies [32], charging scheduling [33], and control of fuel cell-battery systems [34].”
Electric Vehicle Bidirectional Charging Control with Deep Reinforcement Learning
Gei, C., Scherer, J., & Radchenko, G. (2025) · International Conference on Electrical, Computer and Energy Technologies (ICECET) · doi:10.1109/icecet63943.2025.11472556
“We assume that the consumer is a price taker and the the drawn energy does not affect the price [7]–[13].”
InfluentialLi, F., Liu, L. X., Li, D., & Pan, S. (2026) · Journal of Energy Engineering · doi:10.1061/jleed9.eyeng-6477
Electric Vehicle Charging Scheduling Optimization Model Based on Reinforcement Learning
Li, P., Wang, W., Fang, X., Yang, Y., Zhang, X., Li, S., Long, Y., & Hu, X. (2025) · International Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Electrical and Electronic Engineering (AI3E) · doi:10.1109/ai3e69313.2025.00019
“Reference [15] employs deep Q-learning and models charging as a Markov Decision Process to progressively learn optimal charging strategies.”
Cavus, M., Wang, S., Deb, S., Sharma, A., Bell, M., & Dissanayake, D. A. (2026) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-026-43106-6
“Traditional methods rely on static models and rule-based charging management, making them less adaptive to real-time demand variations 31 .”
Xiao, F., Li, H., & Zhang, K. (2026) · World Electric Vehicle Journal · doi:10.3390/wevj17050252
Self-citationFactored deep reinforcement learning framework for electric vehicle charging scheduling
Ye, T., & Tian, Z. (2026) · Journal of Energy Storage · doi:10.1016/j.est.2026.124285
AI-Driven Optimisation of Electric Vehicle Battery Systems: A Comprehensive Review
Singh, A., Bhardwaj, D., Sachan, A. P. S., Singh, A., Rani, M., & Harchand, N. (2026) · International Conference on Computing for Sustainable Global Development · doi:10.23919/indiacom70271.2026.11525997
Iqbal, M. A. (2026) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.6874544
Risk-Aware Energy Management Strategy of Electric Vehicle Charging Station Based on TransQR-DQNPreprint
Zhang, X., Lai, S., Zhang, X., Li, L., Li, X., & Chen, Z. (2026) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.6874496
Wei, X., Yi, H., Yi, H. M., Pang, A., & Yang, W. (2026) · Sustainable Energy Grids and Networks · doi:10.1016/j.segan.2026.102361
Li, Q., Fan, S., Zhou, L., Wang, Z., & Qi, P. (2026) · Energies · doi:10.3390/en19122809
Salehin, M. U. (2026) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.6956671
Pok, P., Woo, S., & Yeo, H. (2026) · ACM Sustainability Week · doi:10.1145/3765611.3815391
Dynamic potential graphs guided real-time coordination for large-scale EV charging stations
Yang, Y., Cui, Q., Wang, Y., & Wang, B. (2026) · Applied Energy · doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2026.128219
A distributed approach for electric vehicle smart charging scheduling using blockchain
Mangini, A. M., Roccotelli, M., Volpe, G., Estil-les, M. D. C., & Fanti, M. P. (2026) · Applied Energy · doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2026.128264
Cao, J., Xu, X., Yao, W., Xue, F., & Long, C. (2026) · Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments · doi:10.1016/j.seta.2026.105158
Waheed, H., & Abro, G. E. M. (2026) · Discover Vehicles · doi:10.1007/s44465-026-00025-0 · Cited by 1
“…have proven most effective for continuous action spaces: deep deterministic policy gradient (DDPG) [59], twin-delayed DDPG (TD3) [60], soft actor-critic (SAC) [61], and proximal policy optimisation (PPO) [62] have all been applied to BESS dispatch and EV charging scheduling [50, 63–66].”
Interpretable Price-Clearing Coordination for Capacity-Constrained Electric-Vehicle ChargingPreprint
Elsayed, S., & Aziz, K. A. (2026) · Research Square · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-10107999/v1
Harak, V., & Samadhiya, A. (2026) · International Conference on Electrical and Electronics for Sustainable Innovations (ICEESI) · doi:10.1109/iceesi68020.2026.11583675
“Wan et al. (2015) proposed a Q-learning based approach to EV charging scheduling, that can adjust sliding system parameters and the user’s taste in cooperation [34].”
Rishitha, M., Nohitha, M., Raj, R. D. A., Yanamala, R. M. R., & Pallakonda, A. (2026) · Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering · doi:10.1007/s13369-026-11426-4
Dong, M., Chen, M., & Wang, Z. (2026) · Journal of Electrical Engineering and Technology · doi:10.1007/s42835-026-02844-3
“For instance, ref [17 ] analyzed the effect of stealthy topology attacks and recommended a detection methodology using state estimation residuals.”
Liu, C., Xu, Z., Huang, H., Zhou, J., Yuan, Y., & Ma, K. (2026) · Journal of Energy Storage · doi:10.1016/j.est.2026.123421
Kharkwal, V. S., & Kharkwal, V. S. (2026) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.7199676
Online EV Fast Charging Scheduling With Energy Storage System Using a Profit-Predictable MILP
Yang, C.-A., Lin, T.-C., Chen, S.-C., Chen, Y.-W., Kuo, J.-J., & Tsai, M.-J. (2026) · IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems · doi:10.1109/tits.2026.3714449
“It is challenging to determine an optimal charging schedule due to inherent randomness in tra ffi c conditions, user commuting behaviors, and fluctuating utility pricing [8].”
InfluentialRehman, A. U., Lu, J., Du, B., Bai, F., Hossain, M. A., & Sanjari, M. J. (2026) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2026.117366
MASAC: A Multi-Agent Soft Actor-Critic Framework for Decentralized EV Charging Networks
Shen, L., Jin, J., Wang, Q., Hao, L., Huang, Q., & Xu, Y. (2026) · IEEE International Conference on Power Science and Technology (ICPST) · doi:10.1109/icpst69917.2026.11636350
“Electric vehicle (EV) charging coordination in distribution networks has become a critical operational challenge as rapid EV adoption leads to concentrated load [1] increases and imposes significant stress on existing distribution infrastructure [2].”
Guanghua, L., Cheng, L., & Shah, S. H. H. (2026) · Journal of Energy Storage · doi:10.1016/j.est.2026.124300
Rahul, R., & Sasikala, K. (2026) · International Conference on Circuit, Power and Computing Technologies · doi:10.1109/iccpct70290.2026.11654688
Liu, Q., Wang, J., Duan, J., Liu, Y., & Chen, Y. (2026) · Energy Conversion and Economics · doi:10.1049/enc2.70046
Sasikumar, J., Raj, K. S. B., Sreerajan, M., Pandi, V. R., Radhu Krishna, R., & Sathyan, S. (2026) · IEEE Open Journal of Vehicular Technology · doi:10.1109/ojvt.2026.3732603
“Wan et al. [22] showed model-free scheduling, which can adjust to non-stationary demand without having an explicit model of the environment.”
Ashkezari, L. S., Yorke‐Smith, N., Bauer, P., & Mouli, G. R. C. (2026) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.7450619
Vikas, G., Jalaluddin, M., Poloju, K. K., Rizwan, M., Latheef, M. A., Uddin, M. Z., & Rahman, A. (2026) · MEC International Conference on Big Data and Smart City (ICBDSC) · doi:10.1109/icadaai64945.2026.11679184
Sanaye, S., Borzuei, D., & Boyaghchi, M. (2026) · Results in Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.rineng.2026.113029
Wang, F., Li, W., & Lu, J. (2026) · Procedia Computer Science · doi:10.1016/j.procs.2026.08.149
Aykut, T., & Güner, S. (2026) · Electronics · doi:10.3390/electronics15184294
He, Y., Li, Z., Wu, X., Wang, Z., Liu, H., Di, X., Sun, K., & Xiangyu, L. (2026) · Energy Technology · doi:10.1002/ente.70625
Han, Y., Zhang, R., Fan, Z., Zhao, Q., Guo, G., & Si, F. (2026) · IEEE Transactions on Automation Science and Engineering · doi:10.1109/tase.2026.3738822
“Model-free deep reinforcement learning has been applied to real-time EV charging without repeatedly solving a complete mathematical program [17].”
Chen, L., Lv, X., Fang, J., Zhou, Y., & Wang, K. (2026) · IEEJ Transactions on Electrical and Electronic Engineering · doi:10.1002/tee.70443
Khan, S., Khan, I., Yadav, V. K., Hasan, S., & Kumar, P. (2026) · International Power Electronics and Motion Control Conference (EPE-PEMC) · doi:10.1109/pemc69244.2026.11726113
Wu, X., Jiang, S., Shi, R., Bai, W., Fang, F., Teng, J., Xu, Y., & Liu, Z. (2026) · Transportation Research Part E Logistics and Transportation Review · doi:10.1016/j.tre.2026.105315
Palta, C., Jain, A., & Lohchab, Y. (2026) · IEEE International Conference on Renewable Energy and Sustainable E-Mobility (RESEM) · doi:10.1109/resem70152.2026.11721620
“Wan et al. [6] showed that even without explicitly programming for price responsiveness and solar-aware charging patterns, reinforcement learning (RL) can learn to develop these responses independently, surpassing traditional rule-based methods for managing EV charging in home energy systems.”
Machine Learning for Real‐Time Energy Optimization
Pindoo, I. A. (2026) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9781394404346.ch1
Jia, G., Qian, J., Pang, Q., Liu, W., & Niu, F. (2026) · International Journal of Emerging Electric Power Systems · doi:10.1515/ijeeps-2026-0097
“Reinforcement learning (RL) provides a complementary mechanism for adaptive decision making, and Deep Deterministic Policy Gradient (DDPG) and Q -learning algorithms have been applied to real-time EV charging scheduling [26, 27].”
Metadata
- Authors
- Wan, Z., Li, H., He, H., & Prokhorov, D.
- Affiliations
- University of Rhode Island (US)
- Shenyang Institute of Automation (CN)
- Toyota Motor North America Research & Development (United States) (US)
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid
- Published
- 2019-09
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 5246-5257
- ISSN
- 1949-3053 (ISSN-L)
- 1949-3061
- OpenAlex
- W2899639849
- Cited by
- 548
- References
- 46
- Citations by year
- 2026: 61 · 2025: 71 · 2024: 83 · 2023: 95 · 2022: 87 · 2021: 74 · 2020: 57 · 2019: 20
- FWCI
- 14.43
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- Licence
- Locations
- IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid (publishedVersion)
- Journal of Media Literacy Education (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- SIA OpenIR (Chinese Academy of Sciences) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Office of Naval Research (N00014-18-1-2396)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Electric Vehicles and Infrastructure
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Smart Grid Energy Management
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Electric Power System Optimization
- Keywords
- electric vehicle charging scheduling, real-time pricing, demand response, deep reinforcement learning, model-free learning, unknown transition probabilities, Markov decision process, Q-network, electricity price forecasting, smart grid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review