Cited by 150Electric Vehicles and InfrastructureSmart Grid Energy ManagementOptimal Power Flow Distribution

Definition and Evaluation of Model-Free Coordination of Electrical Vehicle Charging with Reinforcement Learning

Open access
Sadeghianpourhamami, Nasrin, Deleu, Johannes, Develder, Chris·2020·IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid

Abstract

Demand response (DR) becomes critical to manage the charging load of a growing electric vehicle (EV) deployment. Initial DR studies mainly adopt model predictive control, but models are largely uncertain for the EV scenario (e.g., customer behavior). Model-free approaches, based on reinforcement learning (RL), are an attractive alternative. We propose a new Markov decision process (MDP) formulation in the RL framework, to jointly coordinate a set of charging stations. State-of-the-art algorithms either focus on a single EV, or control an aggregate of EVs in multiple steps (e.g., 1) make aggregate load decisions and 2) translate the aggregate decision to individual EVs). In contrast, our RL approach jointly controls the whole set of EVs at once. We contribute a new MDP formulation with a scalable state representation independent of the number of charging stations. Using a batch RL algorithm, fitted Q-iteration, we learn an optimal charging policy. With simulations using real-world data, we: 1) differentiate settings in training the RL policy (e.g., the time span covered by training data); 2) compare its performance to an oracle all-knowing benchmark (providing an upper performance bound); 3) analyze performance fluctuations throughout a full year; and 4) demonstrate generalization capacity to larger sets of charging stations.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/tsg.2019.2920320

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Advanced optimization- or machine-learning-based schedulers require extensive computational resources and forecasting precision, making them less accessible to DSOs seeking near-term deployment.

    “Second, advanced optimization-or machine-learning-based schedulers (for example, those discussed in [12,13]) require extensive computational resources and forecasting precision, making them less accessible to DSOs seeking near-term deployment.”

    From A Multi-Agent, Laxity-Based Aggregation Strategy for Cost-Effective Electric Vehicle Charging and Local Transformer Overload Prevention (2025) · cites this paper as [13]

    The Generalization to Larger Scales section (p. 9) reports substantial RL training times and says optimization-based approaches, unlike model-free RL, need accurate knowledge of future EV sessions. The Introduction (p. 1) also describes barriers to widespread deployment of model-based approaches. The paper does not say machine-learning schedulers require forecasting precision or assess accessibility to DSOs seeking near-term deployment. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 17

  1. [1][1] A. Afram and F. Janabi-Sharifi, 'Theory and applications of hvac control systems-a review of model predictive control (mpc),' Building and Environment , vol. 72, pp. 343-355, 2014. -
  2. [2][2] J. Ma, J. Qin, T. Salsbury, and P. Xu, 'Demand reduction in building energy systems based on economic model predictive control,' Chemical Engineering Science , vol. 67, no. 1, pp. 92-100, 2012, dynamics, Control and Optimization of Energy Systems. -
  3. [3][3] N. Sadeghianpourhamami, T. Demeester, D. Benoit, M. Strobbe, and C. Develder, 'Modeling and analysis of residential flexibility: Timing of white good usage,' Applied Energy , vol. 179, pp. 790-805, 2016. -
  4. [4][4] N. Sadeghianpourhamami, J. Deleu, and C. Develder, 'Achieving scalable model-free demand response in charging an electric vehicle fleet with reinforcement learning,' in Proc. 9th ACM Int. Conf. Future Energy Systems (e-Energy 2018) , 12-15 Jun. 2018. -
  5. [5][5] M. Riedmiller, 'Neural fitted q iteration-first experiences with a data efficient neural reinforcement learning method,' in 16th European Conference on Machine Learning , vol. 3720. Springer, 2005, pp. 317-328. -
  6. [6][6] W. Shi and V. W. S. Wong, 'Real-time vehicle-to-grid control algorithm under price uncertainty,' in 2011 IEEE International Conference on Smart Grid Communications (SmartGridComm) , Oct 2011, pp. 261266. -
  7. [7][7] A. Chis, J. Lund´ en, and V. Koivunen, 'Reinforcement learning-based plug-in electric vehicle charging with forecasted price,' IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology , vol. 66, no. 5, pp. 3674-3684, May 2017. -
  8. [8][8] B. J. Claessens, S. Vandael, F. Ruelens, K. D. Craemer, and B. Beusen, 'Peak shaving of a heterogeneous cluster of residential flexibility carriers using reinforcement learning,' in IEEE PES ISGT Europe 2013 , Oct 2013, pp. 1-5. -
  9. [9][9] S. Vandael, B. Claessens, M. Hommelberg, T. Holvoet, and G. Deconinck, 'A scalable three-step approach for demand side management of plug-in hybrid vehicles,' IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid , vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 720-728, June 2013. -
  10. [10][10] S. Vandael, B. Claessens, D. Ernst, T. Holvoet, and G. Deconinck, 'Reinforcement learning of heuristic ev fleet charging in a day-ahead electricity market,' IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid , vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 1795-1805, July 2015. -
  11. [11][11] B. J. Claessens, P. Vrancx, and F. Ruelens, 'Convolutional neural networks for automatic state-time feature extraction in reinforcement learning applied to residential load control,' IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid , vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 3259-3269, July 2018. -
  12. [12][12] N. Sadeghianpourhamami, N. Refa, M. Strobbe, and C. Develder, 'Quantitive analysis of electric vehicle flexibility: A data-driven approach,' Int. J. Electr. Power Energy Syst. , vol. 95, pp. 451-462, Feb. 2018. -
  13. [13][13] M. Riedmiller, 10 Steps and Some Tricks to Set up Neural Reinforcement Controllers . Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2012, pp. 735-757. -
  14. [14][14] V. Mnih, K. Kavukcuoglu, D. Silver, A. A. Rusu, J. Veness, M. G. Bellemare, A. Graves, M. Riedmiller, A. K. Fidjeland, G. Ostrovski, S. Petersen, C. Beattie, A. Sadik, I. Antonoglou, H. King, D. Kumaran, D. Wierstra, S. Legg, and D. Hassabis, 'Human-level control through deep reinforcement learning,' Nature , vol. 518, p. 529533, Feb 2015. -
  15. [15][15] P. J. Huber, 'Robust estimation of a location parameter,' Ann. Math. Statist. , vol. 35, no. 1, pp. 73-101, 03 1964. -
  16. [16][16] H. Tang, R. Houthooft, D. Foote, A. Stooke, O. X. Chen, Y. Duan, J. Schulman, F. DeTurck, and P. Abbeel, '# exploration: A study of count-based exploration for deep reinforcement learning,' in Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , 2017, pp. 2753-2762. -
  17. [17][17] V. Mnih, A. P. Badia, M. Mirza, A. Graves, T. Lillicrap, T. Harley, D. Silver, and K. Kavukcuoglu, 'Asynchronous methods for deep reinforcement learning,' in International conference on machine learning , 2016, pp. 1928-1937. -

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sadeghianpourhamami, N., Deleu, J., & Develder, C.
Affiliations
Ghent University (BE)
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid
Published
2020-01
Volume
11
Issue
1
Pages
203-214
ISSN
  • 1949-3053 (ISSN-L)
  • 1949-3061
OpenAlex
W2892403847
Cited by
150
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 16 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 26 · 2023: 26 · 2022: 28 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 5
FWCI
5.66
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • Ghent University Academic Bibliography (Ghent University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
Flemish Government through the VLAIO SBO Project Multi-Agent Learning for Networks (140047)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Electric Vehicles and Infrastructure
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Smart Grid Energy Management
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Optimal Power Flow Distribution
Keywords
electric vehicle charging, demand response, model-free reinforcement learning, Markov decision process, fitted Q-iteration, offline reinforcement learning

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review