Cited by 95Power Line Inspection RobotsInfrastructure Maintenance and MonitoringAdvanced Neural Network Applications

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 28 of the 28 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Intelligent Damage Classification and Estimation in Power Distribution Poles Using Unmanned Aerial Vehicles and Convolutional Neural Networks

Hosseini, Mohammad Mehdi, Umunnakwe, Amarachi, Parvania, Masood, Tasdizen, Tolga·2020·IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid

Abstract

Damage estimation is part of daily operation of power utilities, often requiring a manual process of crew deployment and damage report to quantify and locate damages. Advancement in unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) as well as real-time communication and learning technologies could be harnessed towards efficient and accurate automation of this process. This paper develops a model to automate the process of estimating and localizing damages in power distribution poles, which utilizes the images taken by UAVs transferred in real-time to an intelligent damage classification and estimation (IDCE) unit. The IDCE unit integrates four convolutional neural networks to learn the states of poles from images, extract the image characteristics, and train an automated intelligent tool to replace manual fault location and damage estimation. The proposed model first determines the type of pole damages, including falling and burning, and then estimates the percentage of damage in each type. The IDCE unit also localizes damages in the poles by locating possible burning or arcing parts. A data set of 1615 images is utilized to train, validate and test the proposed model, which demonstrates high accuracy of the model in classifying and estimating damages in distribution poles.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/tsg.2020.2970156

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. 2019, Signal Search Cellphone Service After Major Hurricanes

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 95

Metadata

Authors
Hosseini, M. M., Umunnakwe, A., Parvania, M., & Tasdizen, T.
Affiliations
University of Utah (US)
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid
Published
2020-07
Volume
11
Issue
4
Pages
3325-3333
ISSN
  • 1949-3053 (ISSN-L)
  • 1949-3061
OpenAlex
W3004200729
Cited by
95
References
28
Citations by year
2026: 16 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 6
FWCI
6.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid (publishedVersion)
Funders
Office of Naval Research (N000141812395)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Power Line Inspection Robots
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Infrastructure Maintenance and Monitoring
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
Keywords
damage estimation, unmanned aerial vehicles, convolutional neural networks, fault location, real-time image analysis, power utility automation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review