Cited by 332Smart Grid Security and ResiliencePower System Optimization and StabilityElectricity Theft Detection Techniques

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 34 of the 35 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Detecting False Data Injection Attacks in Smart Grids: A Semi-Supervised Deep Learning Approach

Open access
Zhang, Ying, Wang, Jianhui, Chen, Bo·2021·IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid

Abstract

The dependence on advanced information and communication technology increases the vulnerability in smart grids under cyber-attacks. Recent research on unobservable false data injection attacks (FDIAs) reveals the high risk of secure system operation, since these attacks can bypass current bad data detection mechanisms. To mitigate this risk, this paper proposes a data-driven learning-based algorithm for detecting unobservable FDIAs in distribution systems. We use autoencoders for efficient dimension reduction and feature extraction of measurement datasets. Further, we integrate the autoencoders into an advanced generative adversarial network (GAN) framework, which successfully detects anomalies under FDIAs by capturing the unconformity between abnormal and secure measurements. Also, considering that the datasets collected from practical power systems are partially labeled due to expensive labeling costs and missing labels, the proposed method only requires a few labeled measurement data in addition to unlabeled data for training. Numerical simulations in three-phase unbalanced IEEE 13-bus and 123-bus distribution systems validate the detection accuracy and efficiency of this method.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/tsg.2020.3010510

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. 2011, Smart Meters and Smart Meter Systems A Metering Industry Perspective
  2. 2017, IEEE Test Feeder Specifications
  3. 2016, A Comprehensive guide to Fine-tuning Deep Learning Models in Keras (Part II)

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 332

Metadata

Authors
Zhang, Y., Wang, J., & Chen, B.
Affiliations
  • Southern Methodist University (US)
  • Argonne National Laboratory (US)
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid
Published
2021-01
Volume
12
Issue
1
Pages
623-634
ISSN
  • 1949-3053 (ISSN-L)
  • 1949-3061
OpenAlex
W3044239919
Cited by
332
References
35
Citations by year
2026: 40 · 2025: 83 · 2024: 66 · 2023: 61 · 2022: 58 · 2021: 20
FWCI
17.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid (publishedVersion)
  • OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Smart Grid Security and Resilience
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Power System Optimization and Stability
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Electricity Theft Detection Techniques
Keywords
false data injection attacks, smart grid security, bad data detection, distribution systems, autoencoder, generative adversarial networks, anomaly detection, semi-supervised learning, measurement data, cyberattacks

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review