Cited by 103Optimal Power Flow DistributionSmart Grid and Power SystemsPower System Optimization and Stability

Physics-informed Graphical Representation-enabled Deep Reinforcement Learning for Robust Distribution System Voltage Control

Cao, Di, Zhao, Junbo, Hu, Jiaxiang, Pei, Yansong, Huang, Qi, Chen, Zhe, Hu, Weihao·2024·IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid

Abstract

The anomalous measurements and inaccurate distribution system physical models cause huge challenges for distribution system optimization. This paper proposes a robust voltage control method that can deal with them by systematically integrating a representation network, the deep reinforcement learning (DRL) method, and the surrogate model. The partial observation of the distribution network is first represented as a graph with tree topology that is processed by a physics-informed global graph attention network (GGAT) and a deep auto-encoder (DAE) to achieve informative and robust representation of the real-time and pseudo-measurements. The extracted features are then fed into the soft actor-critic algorithm, during the training of which a graphical-learning-based power flow surrogate model is developed to provide a reward signal for the DRL algorithm. This allows the proposed method to reduce reliance on accurate distribution system parameters. The embedding of the structural information by the GGAT and the informative features extracted by the DAE further enhances the robustness of the proposed method against anomalous measurements. The proposed method is validated using IEEE 33-node and 119-node systems. Simulation results show the robustness of the proposed method against anomalous measurements.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/tsg.2023.3267069

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cao, D., Zhao, J., Hu, J., Pei, Y., Huang, Q., Chen, Z., & Hu, W.
Affiliations
  • University of Electronic Science and Technology of China (CN)
  • University of Connecticut (US)
  • Southwest University of Science and Technology (CN)
  • Aalborg University (DK)
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid
Published
2024-01
Volume
15
Issue
1
Pages
233-246
ISSN
  • 1949-3053 (ISSN-L)
  • 1949-3061
OpenAlex
W4367663518
Cited by
103
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 32 · 2025: 44 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 7
FWCI
7.65
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid (publishedVersion)
  • VBN Forskningsportal (Aalborg Universitet) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Sichuan Province Innovative Talent Funding Project for Postdoctoral Fellows (BX202210)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Optimal Power Flow Distribution
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Smart Grid and Power Systems
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Power System Optimization and Stability
Keywords
deep reinforcement learning, graph representation, soft actor-critic, deep autoencoder, robust optimization

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review