The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A Voting Ensemble Classifier for Wafer Map Defect Patterns Identification in Semiconductor Manufacturing
Abstract
A wafer map contains a graphical representation of the locations about defect pattern on the semiconductor wafer, which can provide useful information for quality engineers. Various defect patterns occur due to increasing wafer sizes and decreasing features sizes, which makes it very complex and unreliable process to identify them. In this paper, we propose a voting ensemble classifier with multi-types features to identify wafer map defect patterns in semiconductor manufacturing. Our research contents can be summarized as follows. First, three distinctive features such as density-, geometry-, and radon-based features were extracted from raw wafer images. Then, we applied four machine learning classifiers, namely logistic regression (LR), random forests (RFs), gradient boosting machine (GBM), and artificial neural network (ANN), and trained them using extracted features of original data set. Then their results were combined with a soft voting ensemble (SVE) technique which assigns higher weights to the classifiers with respect to their prediction accuracy. Consequently, we got performance measures with accuracy, precision, recall, ${F}$ -measure, and AUC score of 95.8616%, 96.9326%, 96.9326%, 96.7124%, and 99.9114%, respectively. These results show that the SVE classifier with proposed multi-types features outperformed regular machine learning-based classifiers for wafer maps defect detection.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
ImageNet classification with deep convolutional neural networks
Krizhevsky, A., Sutskever, I., & Hinton, G. E. (2017) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/3065386 · Cited by 112,155
Greedy function approximation: A gradient boosting machine
Friedman, J. H. (2001) · The Annals of Statistics · doi:10.1214/aos/1013203451 · Cited by 30,731
A decision-theoretic generalization of on-line learning and an application to boosting
Freund, Y., & Schapire, R. E. (1997) · Journal of Computer and System Sciences · doi:10.1006/jcss.1997.1504 · Cited by 20,466
Breiman, L. (1996) · Machine Learning · doi:10.1007/bf00058655 · Cited by 16,325
Wolpert, D. H. (1992) · Neural Networks · doi:10.1016/s0893-6080(05)80023-1 · Cited by 7,951
The Strength of Weak Learnability
Schapire, R. E. (1990) · Machine Learning · doi:10.1007/bf00116037 · Cited by 4,600
Cited by
Machine Learning for industrial applications: A comprehensive literature review
Bertolini, M., Mezzogori, D., Neroni, M., & Zammori, F. (2021) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2021.114820 · Cited by 553
Enhancing Heart Disease Prediction Accuracy through Machine Learning Techniques and Optimization
Chandrasekhar, N., & Peddakrishna, S. (2023) · Processes · doi:10.3390/pr11041210 · Cited by 268
Metadata
- Authors
- Saqlain, M., Jargalsaikhan, B., & Lee, J. Y.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Semiconductor Manufacturing
- Published
- 2019-05
- Volume
- 32
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 171-182
- ISSN
- 0894-6507 (ISSN-L)
- 1558-2345
- OpenAlex
- W2922187519
- Cited by
- 234
- References
- 6
- FWCI
- 17.47
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Voting Ensemble Classifier for Wafer Map Defect Patterns Identification in Semiconductor Manufacturing. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/tsm.2019.2904306
- The paper
- Saqlain, M., Jargalsaikhan, B., & Lee, J. Y. (2019). A Voting Ensemble Classifier for Wafer Map Defect Patterns Identification in Semiconductor Manufacturing. IEEE Transactions on Semiconductor Manufacturing. https://doi.org/10.1109/tsm.2019.2904306
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.