The DOI matches its Crossref record; 14 of the 14 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Toward Interpretation of Complex Structural Models
Abstract
The interpretation of complex structural models is facilitated by a variety of operations that can be carried out by a computer. Several of these involve partitions on a reachability matrix, which describes a contextual relation among the elements of the system under study. When partitioning of the reachability matrix in various ways does not permit adequate interpretation, cycles are usually the source of difficulty. A weighting matrix applied to the elements of a maximal cycle set permits a set of digraphs to be developed, which allows for more detailed interpretation of a cycle. When still further development is needed, the maximal cycle sets can be identified and placed in a hierarchy based on an inclusion relation. This hierarchy suggests a natural order of study of the system proceeding from the least complex maximal cycle sets to the most complex sets.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information.
Miller, G. A. (1956) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/h0043158 · Cited by 17,812
The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information.
Miller, G. A. (1994) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.101.2.343 · Cited by 17,161
Social Choice and Individual Values
Baumol, W. J., & Arrow, K. J. (1952) · Econometrica · doi:10.2307/1907815 · Cited by 4,699
Developing Interconnection Matrices in Structural Modeling
Warfield, J. N. (1974) · IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics · doi:10.1109/tsmc.1974.5408524 · Cited by 1,016
Self-citation(1971) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 863
Algebraic Structure Theory of Sequential Machines
Wagner, E. G., Hartmanis, J., & Stearns, R. E. (1968) · Mathematics of Computation · doi:10.2307/2004808 · Cited by 519
Binary Matrices in System Modeling
Warfield, J. N. (1973) · IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics · doi:10.1109/tsmc.1973.4309270 · Cited by 441
Self-citationStructural Models: An Introduction to the Theory of Directed Graphs.
Leik, R. K., Harary, F., Norman, R. Z., & Cartwright, D. (1966) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.2307/2090928 · Cited by 408
Algebraic structure theory of sequential machines
Hopcroft, J. E. (1967) · Journal of the Franklin Institute · doi:10.1016/0016-0032(67)90243-8 · Cited by 380
Developing Subsystem Matrices in Structural Modeling
Warfield, J. N. (1974) · IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics · doi:10.1109/tsmc.1974.5408523 · Cited by 304
Self-citation
Cited by
Interpreting the Interpretive Structural Model
Sushil (2012) · Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management · doi:10.1007/s40171-012-0008-3 · Cited by 889
Yadav, V. S., Singh, A. R., Raut, R. D., & Govindarajan, U. H. (2020) · Resources, Conservation and Recycling · doi:10.1016/j.resconrec.2020.104877 · Cited by 384
Rana, N. P., Dwivedi, Y. K., & Hughes, D. L. (2022) · Information Technology & People · doi:10.1108/itp-07-2020-0460 · Cited by 122
Analyzing Students’ Technology Use Motivations: An Interpretive Structural Modeling Approach
Guo, Z., Li, Y., & Stevens, K. J. (2012) · Communications of the Association for Information Systems · doi:10.17705/1cais.03014 · Cited by 32
Rane, S. B., & Narvel, Y. A. M. (2021) · International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management · doi:10.1007/s13198-021-01331-4 · Cited by 26
Metadata
- Authors
- Warfield, J. N.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics
- Published
- 1974-09
- Volume
- SMC-4
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 405-417
- ISSN
- 0018-9472 (ISSN-L)
- 2168-2909
- OpenAlex
- W2027798836
- Cited by
- 526
- References
- 14
- FWCI
- 11.71
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Toward Interpretation of Complex Structural Models. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/tsmc.1974.4309336
- The paper
- Warfield, J. N. (1974). Toward Interpretation of Complex Structural Models. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics. https://doi.org/10.1109/tsmc.1974.4309336
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.