The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Building and Understanding Adaptive Systems: A Statistical/Numerical Approach to Factory Automation and Brain Research
Abstract
Successes with expert systems and other specialized systems have revived hopes for factory automation and productivity growth. A full realization of these potentials will require conscious effort to overcome obsolete rigidities, to develop unified and adaptive methods for integrating complex systems, and to increase our understanding of these systems (understanding which is vital to human productivity in developing software). How adaptive systems may be built and understood by extending control theory and statistics is discussed. Adaptive systems, like human infants, are less agile than young monkeys but have something important to contribute as they mature. It argues that the old dream of understanding intelligence in generalized terms, permitting a unified understanding of adaptive systems and of the human mind, was not incorrect; rather, the early attempts in that direction failed because they did not make full use of research possibilities in statistics, control theory, and numerical analysis (many of which are still unexploited) and were limited by hardware costs which are now coming down. A basic adaptive system derived from this approach fits the fundamental, qualitative empirical facts of human brain physiology in some detail (unlike the usual "general neuron models," which rarely even discriminate between basic components of the brain), and offers opportunities for further research; it can even translate certain fundamental ideas of Freud into something more mathematical and scientific. The mathematics of the basic system, and the fit to the brain, are described in detail.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A formal theory of inductive inference. Part II
Solomonoff, R. J. (1964) · Information and Control · doi:10.1016/s0019-9958(64)90131-7 · Cited by 1,758
Cited by
Deep learning in neural networks: an overview
Schmidhuber, J. (2015) · Neural Networks · doi:10.1016/j.neunet.2014.09.003 · Cited by 18,570
Forward models: supervised learning with a distal teacher
Jordan, M. I., & Rumelhart, D. E. (1992) · Cognitive Science · doi:10.1207/s15516709cog1603_1 · Cited by 1,451
Sutton, R. S. (1990) · Machine Learning Proceedings 1990 · doi:10.1016/b978-1-55860-141-3.50030-4 · Cited by 1,314
Dyna, an Integrated Architecture for Learning, Planning, and Reacting
Sutton, R. S. (1991) · ACM SIGART Bulletin · doi:10.1145/122344.122377 · Cited by 777
Adaptive Dynamic Programming for Control: A Survey and Recent Advances
Liu, D., Xue, S., Zhao, B., Luo, B., & Wei, Q. (2021) · IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics: Systems · doi:10.1109/tsmc.2020.3042876 · Cited by 708
Metadata
- Authors
- Werbos, P.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics
- Published
- 1987-01
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 7-20
- ISSN
- 0018-9472 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1969166509
- Cited by
- 251
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 8.98
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Building and Understanding Adaptive Systems: A Statistical/Numerical Approach to Factory Automation and Brain Research. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/tsmc.1987.289329
- The paper
- Werbos, P. (1987). Building and Understanding Adaptive Systems: A Statistical/Numerical Approach to Factory Automation and Brain Research. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics. https://doi.org/10.1109/tsmc.1987.289329
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.