The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Lifelogging Data Validation Model for Internet of Things Enabled Personalized Healthcare
Open accessAbstract
Internet of Things (IoT) technology offers opportunities to monitor lifelogging data by a variety of assets, like wearable sensors, mobile apps, etc. But due to heterogeneity of connected devices and diverse human life patterns in an IoT environment, lifelogging personal data contains huge uncertainty and are hardly used for healthcare studies. Effective validation of lifelogging personal data for longitudinal health assessment is demanded. In this paper, lifelogging physical activity (LPA) is taken as a target to explore how to improve the validity of lifelogging data in an IoT enabled healthcare system. A rule-based adaptive LPA validation (LPAV) model, LPAV-IoT, is proposed for eliminating irregular uncertainties (IUs) and estimating data reliability in IoT healthcare environments. A methodology specifying four layers and three modules in LPAV-IoT is presented for analyzing key factors impacting validity of LPA. A series of validation rules are designed with uncertainty threshold parameters and reliability indicators and evaluated through experimental investigations. Following LPAV-IoT, a case study on a personalized healthcare platform myhealthavatar connecting three state-of-the-art wearable devices and mobile apps are carried out. The results reflect that the rules provided by LPAV-IoT enable efficiently filtering at least 75% of IU and adaptively indicating the reliability of LPA data on certain condition of IoT environments.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Smart community: an internet of things application
Li, X., Lu, R., Liang, X., Shen, X., Chen, J., & Lin, X. (2011) · IEEE Communications Magazine · doi:10.1109/mcom.2011.6069711 · Cited by 586
An evaluation of wearable activity monitoring devices
Guo, F., Li, Y., Kankanhalli, M. S., & Brown, M. S. (2013) · Proceedings of the 1st ACM international workshop on Personal data meets distributed multimedia · doi:10.1145/2509352.2512882 · Cited by 80
Cited by
Industry 4.0: state of the art and future trends
Xu, L. D., Xu, E. L., & Li, L. (2018) · International Journal of Production Research · doi:10.1080/00207543.2018.1444806 · Cited by 3,221
Self-citationChina's manufacturing locus in 2025: With a comparison of “Made-in-China 2025” and “Industry 4.0”
Li, L. (2018) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2017.05.028 · Cited by 1,073
Yang (2019) · doi:10.1145/3339474 · Cited by 632
Manogaran, G., Varatharajan, R., Lopez, D., Kumar, P. M., Sundarasekar, R., & Thota, C. (2018) · Future Generation Computer Systems · doi:10.1016/j.future.2017.10.045 · Cited by 512
A systematic review of IoT in healthcare: Applications, techniques, and trends
Haghi Kashani, M., Madanipour, M., Nikravan, M., Asghari, P., & Mahdipour, E. (2021) · Journal of Network and Computer Applications · doi:10.1016/j.jnca.2021.103164 · Cited by 491
Metadata
- Authors
- Yang, P., Stankevicius, D., Marozas, V., Deng, Z., Liu, E., Lukosevicius, A., Dong, F., Xu, L., & Min, G.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics: Systems
- Published
- 2018-01
- Volume
- 48
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 50-64
- ISSN
- 2168-2216 (ISSN-L)
- 2168-2232
- OpenAlex
- W2501162690
- Cited by
- 163
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 19.17
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Lifelogging Data Validation Model for Internet of Things Enabled Personalized Healthcare. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/tsmc.2016.2586075
- The paper
- Yang, P., Stankevicius, D., Marozas, V., Deng, Z., Liu, E., Lukosevicius, A., Dong, F., Xu, L., & Min, G. (2018). Lifelogging Data Validation Model for Internet of Things Enabled Personalized Healthcare. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics: Systems. https://doi.org/10.1109/tsmc.2016.2586075
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
