CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 118

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Web3-Based Decentralized Autonomous Organizations and Operations: Architectures, Models, and Mechanisms

Qin, Rui, Ding, Wenwen, Li, Juanjuan, Guan, Sangtian, Wang, Ge, Ren, Yuhai, Qu, Zhiyou·2023·IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics: Systems
DOI 10.1109/tsmc.2022.3228530
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/tsmc.2022.3228530

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • DeSci teams could adopt a progressive decentralization approach, as other DAO have done or deviated from the DAO model, and adopt new frameworks for decentralized organizations.

    “We could expect that DeSci teams would adopt a progressive decentralization approach, as other DAO have done or deviated from the DAO model, and adopt new frameworks for decentralized organizations (Qin et al., 2023).”

    From Exploring the decentralized science ecosystem: insights on organizational structures, technologies, and funding (2025) · cites this paper as Qin et al., 2023

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 55

  1. 10.1109/TCSS.2019.2938190 · DOI · Paper page
  2. 10.1186/s13174-021-00139-6 · DOI · Paper page
  3. 10.3233/IP-190154 · DOI · Paper page
  4. Braun, 2022, Collusion-proof decentralized autonomous organizations
  5. 10.1016/j.dss.2019.01.006 · DOI
  6. 10.1109/TSMC.2020.3040789 · DOI
  7. 10.1109/TCSS.2020.2991097 · DOI
  8. 10.1109/TSMC.2019.2903485 · DOI
  9. 10.1109/TSMC.2019.2930418 · DOI
  10. Qin, 2021, The new understanding of DAOs: From both organizational and operational perspectives, Int. J. Intell. Control Syst., 5, 12
  11. 10.1109/JAS.2021.1004207 · DOI
  12. 10.1109/TSMC.2020.2964797 · DOI
  13. 10.1109/DTPI52967.2021.9540069 · DOI
  14. Malik, 2012, Corporate Policy and Governance: How Organizations Self-Organize
  15. 10.1109/JAS.2016.7510067 · DOI
  16. 10.1109/TCSS.2020.3023046 · DOI
  17. Wang, 2020, Parallel philosophy and intelligent science: From Leibniz’s Monad to blockchain DAO, Pattern Recognit. Artif. Intell., 33, 1055
  18. 10.1109/JAS.2020.1003518 · DOI
  19. 10.1109/TIV.2020.3012947 · DOI
  20. 10.1109/TIV.2019.2955853 · DOI
  21. 10.1109/MIS.2022.3154541 · DOI
  22. 10.1109/TCSS.2022.3145165 · DOI
  23. 10.1109/JAS.2022.106022 · DOI
  24. 10.1109/TCSS.2022.3172671 · DOI
  25. Wang, 1986, An organizational framework and its decision processes for hierarchical intelligent control systems using category and entropy
  26. 10.1109/ISIC.1988.65400 · DOI
  27. 10.1016/0005-1098(90)90001-X · DOI
  28. 10.1109/ROBOT.1991.132037 · DOI
  29. 10.1109/JAS.2021.1003934 · DOI
  30. 10.1037/13978-000 · DOI
  31. 10.1109/TIV.2019.2955905 · DOI
  32. 10.1109/TSMC.2020.3019272 · DOI
  33. 10.1109/TSMC.2018.2837165 · DOI
  34. 10.1109/JAS.2021.1004222 · DOI
  35. 10.1109/JAS.2020.1003039 · DOI
  36. 10.1109/TSMC.2019.2914385 · DOI
  37. 10.1109/TSMC.2018.2872842 · DOI
  38. 10.1109/TSMC.2019.2933327 · DOI
  39. 10.1109/MIS.2022.3167070 · DOI
  40. 10.1109/TCSS.2022.3204745 · DOI · Paper page
  41. 10.1038/d41586-021-03642-9 · DOI · Paper page
  42. 10.1109/MIS.2022.3197950 · DOI
  43. Li, 2022, The mechanism design issues of blockchain-based DAOs, J. Intell. Sci. Technol., 2, 1
  44. Posner, 2014, Quadratic voting as efficient corporate governance, Univ. Chicago Law Rev., 81, 251
  45. 10.1111/jopp.12008 · DOI
  46. 10.1109/TSMC.2019.2897379 · DOI
  47. 10.1109/TSMC.2018.2852810 · DOI
  48. 10.1109/TIV.2019.2955367 · DOI
  49. 10.1109/TSMC.2019.2899626 · DOI
  50. Gigerenzer, 2002, Adaptive Thinking–Rationality in the Real World, 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195153729.001.0001 · DOI
  51. Li, 2021, Blockchain-based digital currency: The state of the art and future trends, Acta Automatica Sinica, 47, 715
  52. Wang, 2022, Parallel management: The DAO to smart ecological technology for complexity management intelligence, Acta Automatica Sinica, 48, 2655
  53. Qin, 2021, NFT: Blockchain-based non-fungible token and applications, Chin. J. Intell. Sci. Technol., 3, 110
  54. 10.1109/TCSS.2021.3109359 · DOI
  55. 10.2139/ssrn.4105763 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Qin, R., Ding, W., Li, J., Guan, S., Wang, G., Ren, Y., & Qu, Z.
Affiliations
  • State Key Laboratory for Management and Control of Complex Systems, Institute of Automation, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China
  • Macao Institute of Systems Engineering, Macau University of Science and Technology, Macau, China
  • Laboratory for Parallel Intelligence, North Automatic Control Technology Institute, Taiyuan, China
ORCID
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics: Systems
Publisher
Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE)
Published
2023-04
Volume
53
Issue
4
Pages
2073-2082
ISSN
  • 2168-2216
  • 2168-2232
DOI
10.1109/tsmc.2022.3228530
Cited by
118
References
0
Licence
creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode (vor)
Funders
  • National Key Research and Development Program of China (2018AAA01014)
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (62103411)
  • Science and Technology Development Fund of Macau SAR (0050/2020/A1)
  • International Partnership Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (GJHZ202112)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review