A probabilistic framework for modeling and real-time monitoring human fatigue
Abstract
A probabilistic framework based on the Bayesian networks for modeling and real-time inferring human fatigue by integrating information from various sensory data and certain relevant contextual information is introduced. A static fatigue model that captures the static relationships between fatigue, significant factors that cause fatigue, and various sensory observations that typically result from fatigue is first presented. Such a model provides mathematically coherent and sound basis for systematically aggregating uncertain evidences from different sources, augmented with relevant contextual information. The static model, however, fails to capture the dynamic aspect of fatigue. Fatigue is a cognitive state that is developed over time. To account for the temporal aspect of human fatigue, the static fatigue model is extended based on dynamic Bayesian networks. The dynamic fatigue model allows to integrate fatigue evidences not only spatially but also temporally, therefore, leading to a more robust and accurate fatigue modeling and inference. A real-time nonintrusive fatigue monitor was built based on integrating the proposed fatigue model with a computer vision system developed for extracting various visual cues typically related to fatigue. Performance evaluation of the fatigue monitor using both synthetic and real data demonstrates the validity of the proposed fatigue model in both modeling and real-time inference of fatigue.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Most of AFER was used for predicting primary affective states of basic emotions, but FEs were also used for predicting non-primary affective states such as complex mental states, fatigue, frustration, pain, depression, mood and personality traits.
“Most of AFER was used for predicting primary affective states of basic emotions, such as anger or happiness but FEs were also used for predicting non-primary affective states such as complex mental states [223], fatigue [224], frustration [44], pain [185], [186], [225], depression [53], [250], mood and personality traits [251], [252].”
From Survey on RGB, 3D, Thermal, and Multimodal Approaches for Facial Expression Recognition: History, Trends, and Affect-Related Applications (2016) · cites this paper as [224]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Corneanu, C. A., Simon, M. O., Cohn, J. F., & Guerrero, S. E. (2016) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2016.2515606 · Cited by 527 · see citing works
Driver Behavior and Situation Aware Brake Assistance for Intelligent Vehicles
McCall, J. C., & Trivedi, M. M. (2007) · Proceedings of the IEEE · doi:10.1109/jproc.2006.888388 · Cited by 229 · see citing works
A survey of affect recognition methods: audio, visual and spontaneous expressions
Zeng, Z., Pantic, M., Roisman, G. I., & Huang, T. S. (2007) · Proceedings of the 9th international conference on Multimodal interfaces · doi:10.1145/1322192.1322216 · Cited by 144 · see citing works
- Authors
- Ji, Q., Lan, P., & Looney, C.
- Affiliations
- Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute (US)
- University of Nevada, Reno (US)
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics - Part A: Systems and Humans
- Published
- 2006-09
- Volume
- 36
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 862-875
- ISSN
- 1083-4427 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2171221410
- Cited by
- 245
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 15
- FWCI
- 13.87
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- IEEE Transactions on Systems Man and Cybernetics - Part A Systems and Humans (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and Work-Related Fatigue
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Context-Aware Activity Recognition Systems
- Keywords
- Bayesian networks, dynamic Bayesian networks, real-time monitoring, computer vision, contextual information
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review