The DOI matches its Crossref record.
An Effective PSO-Based Memetic Algorithm for Flow Shop Scheduling
Abstract
This paper proposes an effective particle swarm optimization (PSO)-based memetic algorithm (MA) for the permutation flow shop scheduling problem (PFSSP) with the objective to minimize the maximum completion time, which is a typical non-deterministic polynomial-time (NP) hard combinatorial optimization problem. In the proposed PSO-based MA (PSOMA), both PSO-based searching operators and some special local searching operators are designed to balance the exploration and exploitation abilities. In particular, the PSOMA applies the evolutionary searching mechanism of PSO, which is characterized by individual improvement, population cooperation, and competition to effectively perform exploration. On the other hand, the PSOMA utilizes several adaptive local searches to perform exploitation. First, to make PSO suitable for solving PFSSP, a ranked-order value rule based on random key representation is presented to convert the continuous position values of particles to job permutations. Second, to generate an initial swarm with certain quality and diversity, the famous Nawaz-Enscore-Ham (NEH) heuristic is incorporated into the initialization of population. Third, to balance the exploration and exploitation abilities, after the standard PSO-based searching operation, a new local search technique named NEH_1 insertion is probabilistically applied to some good particles selected by using a roulette wheel mechanism with a specified probability. Fourth, to enrich the searching behaviors and to avoid premature convergence, a simulated annealing (SA)-based local search with multiple different neighborhoods is designed and incorporated into the PSOMA. Meanwhile, an effective adaptive meta-Lamarckian learning strategy is employed to decide which neighborhood to be used in SA-based local search. Finally, to further enhance the exploitation ability, a pairwise-based local search is applied after the SA-based search. Simulation results based on benchmarks demonstrate the effectiveness of the PSOMA. Additionally, the effects of some parameters on optimization performances are also discussed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Comparison of Three Evolutionary Algorithms: GA, PSO, and DE
Kachitvichyanukul, V. (2012) · Industrial Engineering and Management Systems · doi:10.7232/iems.2012.11.3.215 · Cited by 355
Fog Computing for Energy-Aware Load Balancing and Scheduling in Smart Factory
Wan, J., Chen, B., Wang, S., Xia, M., Li, D., & Liu, C. (2018) · IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics · doi:10.1109/tii.2018.2818932 · Cited by 322
Conservation of Information in Search: Measuring the Cost of Success
Dembski, W. A., & Marks II, R. J. (2009) · IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics - Part A: Systems and Humans · doi:10.1109/tsmca.2009.2025027 · Cited by 59
Minimalistic Attacks: How Little It Takes to Fool Deep Reinforcement Learning Policies
Qu, X., Sun, Z., Ong, Y.-S., Gupta, A., & Wei, P. (2021) · IEEE Transactions on Cognitive and Developmental Systems · doi:10.1109/tcds.2020.2974509 · Cited by 40
Metadata
- Authors
- Liu, B., Wang, L., & Jin, Y.-H.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, Part B (Cybernetics)
- Published
- 2007-02
- Volume
- 37
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 18-27
- ISSN
- 1083-4419 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2101097701
- Cited by
- 480
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 66.03
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: An Effective PSO-Based Memetic Algorithm for Flow Shop Scheduling. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/tsmcb.2006.883272
- The paper
- Liu, B., Wang, L., & Jin, Y.-H. (2007). An Effective PSO-Based Memetic Algorithm for Flow Shop Scheduling. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, Part B (Cybernetics). https://doi.org/10.1109/tsmcb.2006.883272
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.