Cited by 243Chaos-based Image/Signal EncryptionPhysical Unclonable Functions (PUFs) and Hardware SecurityChaos control and synchronization

Embeddable ADC-based true random number generator for cryptographic applications exploiting nonlinear signal processing and chaos

Callegari, S., Rovatti, R., Setti, G.·2005·IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing

Abstract

We present a true random number generator which, contrary to other implementations, is not based on the explicit observation of complex micro-cosmic processes but on standard signal processing primitives, freeing the designer from the need for dedicated hardware. The system can be implemented from now ubiquitous analog-to-digital converters building blocks, and is therefore well-suited to embedding. On current technologies, the design permits data rates in the order of a few tens of megabits per second. Furthermore, the absence of predictable, repeatable behaviors increases the system security for cryptographic applications. The design relies on a simple inner model based on chaotic dynamics which, in ideal conditions, can be formally proven to generate perfectly uncorrelated binary sequences. Here, we detail the design and we validate the quality of its output against a couple of test suites standardized by the U.S. National Institute of Standards and Technology, both in the ideal case and assuming implementation errors.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/tsp.2004.839924

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 24 · Cited by 243

Authors
Callegari, S., Rovatti, R., & Setti, G.
Affiliations
  • University of Bologna (IT)
  • University of Ferrara (IT)
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing
Published
2005-02
Volume
53
Issue
2
Pages
793-805
ISSN
1053-587X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4254369800
Cited by
243
References
24
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 5
FWCI
16.28
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing (publishedVersion)
  • Archivio istituzionale della ricerca (Alma Mater Studiorum Università di Bologna) (submittedVersion)
  • PORTO@Iris (submittedVersion)
  • PORTO Publications Open Repository TOrino (Politecnico di Torino) (submittedVersion)
  • Institutional Research Information System University of Ferrara (University of Ferrara) (submittedVersion)
  • IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Chaos-based Image/Signal Encryption
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Hardware and Architecture › Physical Unclonable Functions (PUFs) and Hardware Security
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Chaos control and synchronization
Keywords
true random number generator, chaotic dynamics, analog-to-digital converter, nonlinear signal processing, cryptographic randomness, embedded hardware, implementation errors, hardware security

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review