The DOI matches its OpenAlex record.
Exposing digital forgeries by detecting traces of resampling
Abstract
The unique stature of photographs as a definitive recording of events is being diminished due, in part, to the ease with which digital images can be manipulated and altered. Although good forgeries may leave no visual clues of having been tampered with, they may, nevertheless, alter the underlying statistics of an image. For example, we describe how re-sampling (e.g., scaling or rotating) introduces specific statistical correlations, and describe how these correlations can be automatically detected in any portion of an image. This technique works in the absence of any digital watermark or signature. We show the efficacy of this approach on uncompressed TIFF images, and JPEG and GIF images with minimal compression. We expect this technique to be among the first of many tools that will be needed to expose digital forgeries. I.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
CNN-Generated Images Are Surprisingly Easy to Spot… for Now
Wang, S.-Y., Wang, O., Zhang, R., Owens, A., & Efros, A. A. (2020) · 2020 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr42600.2020.00872 · Cited by 1,210
A Deep Learning Approach to Universal Image Manipulation Detection Using a New Convolutional Layer
Bayar, B., & Stamm, M. C. (2016) · Proceedings of the 4th ACM Workshop on Information Hiding and Multimedia Security · doi:10.1145/2909827.2930786 · Cited by 838
Exposing DeepFake Videos By Detecting Face Warping Artifacts
Li, Y., & Lyu, S. (2018) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1811.00656 · Cited by 785
Information Forensics: An Overview of the First Decade
Stamm, M. C., Wu, M., & Liu, K. J. R. (2013) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2013.2260814 · Cited by 394
What Makes Fake Images Detectable? Understanding Properties that Generalize
Chai, L., Bau, D., Lim, S.-N., & Isola, P. (2020) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-58574-7_7 · Cited by 357
Metadata
- Authors
- Popescu, A., & Farid, H.
- Published
- 2005-02-01
- Volume
- 53
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 758-767
- DOI
- 10.1109/tsp.2004.839932(410
- OpenAlex
- W2155180118
- Cited by
- 655
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 27.12
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Exposing digital forgeries by detecting traces of resampling. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/tsp.2004.839932(410
- The paper
- Popescu, A., & Farid, H. (2005). Exposing digital forgeries by detecting traces of resampling. https://doi.org/10.1109/tsp.2004.839932(410
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.