The DOI matches its Crossref record; 15 of the 15 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
On the complexity of sphere decoding in digital communications
Open accessAbstract
Sphere decoding has been suggested by a number of authors as an efficient algorithm to solve various detection problems in digital communications. In some cases, the algorithm is referred to as an algorithm of polynomial complexity without clearly specifying what assumptions are made about the problem structure. Another claim is that although worst-case complexity is exponential, the expected complexity of the algorithm is polynomial. Herein, we study the expected complexity where the problem size is defined to be the number of symbols jointly detected, and our main result is that the expected complexity is exponential for fixed signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), contrary to previous claims. The sphere radius, which is a parameter of the algorithm, must be chosen to ensure a nonvanishing probability of solving the detection problem. This causes the exponential complexity since the squared radius must grow linearly with problem size. The rate of linear increase is, however, dependent on the noise variance, and thus, the rate of the exponential function is strongly dependent on the SNR. Therefore sphere decoding can be efficient for some SNR and problems of moderate size, even though the number of operations required by the algorithm strictly speaking always grows as an exponential function of the problem size.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
(2007) · Electronics: A First Course · doi:10.4324/9780080477527-64 · Cited by 24,923
The Design and Analysis of Computer Algorithms
Aho, A. V., & Hopcroft, J. E. (1974) · CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research) · Cited by 9,403
Integer and Combinatorial Optimization
Williams, H. P., Nemhauser, G. L., & Wolsey, L. A. (1990) · Journal of the Operational Research Society · doi:10.2307/2583737 · Cited by 5,485
Verdú, S. (1998) · Cited by 4,711
Integer and Combinatorial Optimization
Nemhauser, G., & Wolsey, L. (1988) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9781118627372 · Cited by 3,176
Proakis, J. G., & Salehi, M. (1983) · Cited by 2,701
Lee, E. A., & Messerschmitt, D. G. (1994) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4615-3136-4 · Cited by 1,683
A universal lattice code decoder for fading channels
Viterbo, E., & Bouros, J. (1999) · IEEE Transactions on Information Theory · doi:10.1109/18.771234 · Cited by 1,513
Fincke, U., & Pohst, M. (1985) · Mathematics of Computation · doi:10.1090/s0025-5718-1985-0777278-8 · Cited by 1,458
Closest point search in lattices
Agrell, E., Eriksson, T., Vardy, A., & Zeger, K. (2002) · IEEE Transactions on Information Theory · doi:10.1109/tit.2002.800499 · Cited by 1,412
Cited by
Scaling Up MIMO: Opportunities and Challenges with Very Large Arrays
Rusek, F., Persson, D., Lau, B. K., Larsson, E. G., Marzetta, T. L., & Tufvesson, F. (2013) · IEEE Signal Processing Magazine · doi:10.1109/msp.2011.2178495 · Cited by 4,654
Semidefinite Relaxation of Quadratic Optimization Problems
Luo, Z.-Q., Ma, W.-K., So, A., Ye, Y., & Zhang, S. (2010) · IEEE Signal Processing Magazine · doi:10.1109/msp.2010.936019 · Cited by 3,715
An introduction to convex optimization for communications and signal processing
Luo, Z.-Q., & Yu, W. (2006) · IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications · doi:10.1109/jsac.2006.879347 · Cited by 562
Quantized Precoding for Massive MU-MIMO
Jacobsson, S., Durisi, G., Coldrey, M., Goldstein, T., & Studer, C. (2017) · IEEE Transactions on Communications · doi:10.1109/tcomm.2017.2723000 · Cited by 367
Metadata
- Authors
- Jalden, J., & Ottersten, B.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing
- Published
- 2005-04
- Volume
- 53
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1474-1484
- ISSN
- 1053-587X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2148907454
- Cited by
- 720
- References
- 15
- FWCI
- 45.76
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: On the complexity of sphere decoding in digital communications. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/tsp.2005.843746
- The paper
- Jalden, J., & Ottersten, B. (2005). On the complexity of sphere decoding in digital communications. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing. https://doi.org/10.1109/tsp.2005.843746
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.