The DOI matches its Crossref record; 30 of the 30 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Robust minimum variance beamforming
Abstract
This paper introduces an extension of minimum variance beamforming that explicitly takes into account variation or uncertainty in the array response. Sources of this uncertainty include imprecise knowledge of the angle of arrival and uncertainty in the array manifold. In our method, uncertainty in the array manifold is explicitly modeled via an ellipsoid that gives the possible values of the array for a particular look direction. We choose weights that minimize the total weighted power output of the array, subject to the constraint that the gain should exceed unity for all array responses in this ellipsoid. The robust weight selection process can be cast as a second-order cone program that can be solved efficiently using Lagrange multiplier techniques. If the ellipsoid reduces to a single point, the method coincides with Capon's method. We describe in detail several methods that can be used to derive an appropriate uncertainty ellipsoid for the array response. We form separate uncertainty ellipsoids for each component in the signal path (e.g., antenna, electronics) and then determine an aggregate uncertainty ellipsoid from these. We give new results for modeling the element-wise products of ellipsoids. We demonstrate the robust beamforming and the ellipsoidal modeling methods with several numerical examples.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Golub, G. (2012) · doi:10.56021/9781421407944 · Cited by 34,505
Linear Matrix Inequalities in System and Control Theory
Boyd, S., El Ghaoui, L., Feron, E., & Balakrishnan, V. (1994) · Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics eBooks · doi:10.1137/1.9781611970777 · Cited by 21,687
Self-citationHorn, R. A., & Johnson, C. R. (1991) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511840371 · Cited by 9,319
Rogers, S. (1996) · Control Engineering Practice · doi:10.1016/0967-0661(96)82838-3 · Cited by 9,278
High-resolution frequency-wavenumber spectrum analysis
Capon, J. (1969) · Proceedings of the IEEE · doi:10.1109/proc.1969.7278 · Cited by 6,374
Vandenberghe, L., & Boyd, S. (1996) · SIAM Review · doi:10.1137/1038003 · Cited by 4,105
Self-citationConstrained Optimization and Lagrange Multiplier Methods
(1982) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/c2013-0-10366-2 · Cited by 4,016
Buckingham, R. A. (1966) · Cited by 2,899
Ben-Tal, A., & Nemirovski, A. (1998) · Mathematics of Operations Research · doi:10.1287/moor.23.4.769 · Cited by 2,598
Applications of second-order cone programming
Lobo, M. S., Vandenberghe, L., Boyd, S., & Lebret, H. (1998) · Linear Algebra and its Applications · doi:10.1016/s0024-3795(98)10032-0 · Cited by 2,401
Self-citation
Cited by
Convex Optimization in Signal Processing and Communications
(2009) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511804458 · Cited by 554
Theory and applications of robust optimization
Bertsimas, D., Brown, D. B., & Caramanis, C. (2011) · SIAM Review · doi:10.1137/080734510 · Cited by 134
Metadata
- Authors
- Lorenz, R. G., & Boyd, S. P.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing
- Published
- 2005-05
- Volume
- 53
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1684-1696
- ISSN
- 1053-587X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2166117654
- Cited by
- 774
- References
- 30
- FWCI
- 59.99
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Robust minimum variance beamforming. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/tsp.2005.845436
- The paper
- Lorenz, R. G., & Boyd, S. P. (2005). Robust minimum variance beamforming. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing. https://doi.org/10.1109/tsp.2005.845436
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.