The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Sparsity-Cognizant Total Least-Squares for Perturbed Compressive Sampling
Open accessAbstract
Solving linear regression problems based on the total least-squares (TLS) criterion has well-documented merits in various applications, where perturbations appear both in the data vector as well as in the regression matrix. However, existing TLS approaches do not account for sparsity possibly present in the unknown vector of regression coefficients. On the other hand, sparsity is the key attribute exploited by modern compressive sampling and variable selection approaches to linear regression, which include noise in the data, but do not account for perturbations in the regression matrix. The present paper fills this gap by formulating and solving (regularized) TLS optimization problems under sparsity constraints. Near-optimum and reduced-complexity suboptimum sparse (S-) TLS algorithms are developed to address the perturbed compressive sampling (and the related dictionary learning) challenge, when there is a mismatch between the true and adopted bases over which the unknown vector is sparse. The novel S-TLS schemes also allow for perturbations in the regression matrix of the least-absolute selection and shrinkage selection operator (Lasso), and endow TLS approaches with ability to cope with sparse, under-determined “errors-in-variables” models. Interesting generalizations can further exploit prior knowledge on the perturbations to obtain novel weighted and structured S-TLS solvers. Analysis and simulations demonstrate the practical impact of S-TLS in calibrating the mismatch effects of contemporary grid-based approaches to cognitive radio sensing, and robust direction-of-arrival estimation using antenna arrays.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Regression shrinkage and selection via the lasso
Tibshirani, R. (1996) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology · doi:10.1111/j.2517-6161.1996.tb02080.x · Cited by 51,482
The Elements of Statistical Learning
Hastie, T., Tibshirani, R., & Friedman, J. (2009) · Springer Series in Statistics · doi:10.1007/978-0-387-84858-7 · Cited by 25,970
The Elements of Statistical Learning
Hastie, T., Friedman, J., & Tibshirani, R. (2001) · Springer Series in Statistics · doi:10.1007/978-0-387-21606-5 · Cited by 24,162
The adaptive lasso and its oracle properties
Zou, H. (2006) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1198/016214506000000735 · Cited by 7,470
Cited by
Solving inverse problems using data-driven models
Arridge, S., Maass, P., Öktem, O., & Schönlieb, C.-B. (2019) · Acta Numerica · doi:10.1017/s0962492919000059 · Cited by 686
Compressive Sensing in Electromagnetics - A Review
Massa, A., Rocca, P., & Oliveri, G. (2015) · IEEE Antennas and Propagation Magazine · doi:10.1109/map.2015.2397092 · Cited by 360
Sparse methods for direction-of-arrival estimation
Yang, Z., Li, J., Stoica, P., & Xie, L. (2018) · Academic Press Library in Signal Processing, Volume 7 · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-811887-0.00011-0 · Cited by 332
Metadata
- Authors
- Zhu, H., Leus, G., & Giannakis, G. B.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing
- Published
- 2011-05
- Volume
- 59
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 2002-2016
- ISSN
- 1053-587X (ISSN-L)
- 1941-0476
- OpenAlex
- W2162876243
- Cited by
- 410
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 27.10
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Sparsity-Cognizant Total Least-Squares for Perturbed Compressive Sampling. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/tsp.2011.2109956
- The paper
- Zhu, H., Leus, G., & Giannakis, G. B. (2011). Sparsity-Cognizant Total Least-Squares for Perturbed Compressive Sampling. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing. https://doi.org/10.1109/tsp.2011.2109956
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.