Cited by 1,531Advanced Graph Neural NetworksMathematical Analysis and Transform MethodsGraph Theory and Algorithms

Discrete Signal Processing on Graphs

Open access
Sandryhaila, Aliaksei, Moura, José M. F.·2013·IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing

Abstract

In social settings, individuals interact through webs of relationships. Each individual is a node in a complex network (or graph) of interdependencies and generates data, lots of data. We label the data by its source, or formally stated, we index the data by the nodes of the graph. The resulting signals (data indexed by the nodes) are far removed from time or image signals indexed by well ordered time samples or pixels. DSP, discrete signal processing, provides a comprehensive, elegant, and efficient methodology to describe, represent, transform, analyze, process, or synthesize these well ordered time or image signals. This paper extends to signals on graphs DSP and its basic tenets, including filters, convolution,z-transform, impulse response, spectral representation, Fourier transform, frequency response, and illustrates DSP on graphs by classifying blogs, linear predicting and compressing data from irregularly located weather stations, or predicting behavior of customers of a mobile service provider.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/tsp.2013.2238935

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sandryhaila, A., & Moura, J. M. F.
Affiliations
Carnegie Mellon University (US)
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing
Published
2013-04
Volume
61
Issue
7
Pages
1644-1656
ISSN
  • 1053-587X (ISSN-L)
  • 1941-0476
OpenAlex
W1991252559
Cited by
1,531
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 90 · 2025: 102 · 2024: 115 · 2023: 109 · 2022: 123 · 2021: 153 · 2020: 171 · 2019: 153 · 2018: 157 · 2017: 150 · 2016: 99 · 2015: 69 · 2014: 28 · 2013: 12
FWCI
76.69
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Advanced Graph Neural Networks
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Applied Mathematics › Mathematical Analysis and Transform Methods
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Graph Theory and Algorithms
Keywords
graph signal processing, discrete-time signal processing, graph filters, graph convolution, z-transform, impulse response, spectral representation, Fourier transform, frequency response, social networks, complex networks, linear prediction, weather station data, customer behavior prediction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review