The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Improving Physical Layer Secrecy Using Full-Duplex Jamming Receivers
Open accessAbstract
This paper studies secrecy rate optimization in a wireless network with a single-antenna source, a multi-antenna destination and a multi-antenna eavesdropper. This is an unfavorable scenario for secrecy performance as the system is interference-limited. In the literature, assuming that the receiver operates in half duplex (HD) mode, the aforementioned problem has been addressed via use of cooperating nodes who act as jammers to confound the eavesdropper. This paper investigates an alternative solution, which assumes the availability of a full duplex (FD) receiver. In particular, while receiving data, the receiver transmits jamming noise to degrade the eavesdropper channel. The proposed self-protection scheme eliminates the need for external helpers and provides system robustness. For the case in which global channel state information is available, we aim to design the optimal jamming covariance matrix that maximizes the secrecy rate and mitigates loop interference associated with the FD operation. We consider both fixed and optimal linear receiver design at the destination, and show that the optimal jamming covariance matrix is rank-1, and can be found via an efficient 1-D search. For the case in which only statistical information on the eavesdropper channel is available, the optimal power allocation is studied in terms of ergodic and outage secrecy rates. Simulation results verify the analysis and demonstrate substantial performance gain over conventional HD operation at the destination.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Simultaneous Wireless Information and Power Transfer (SWIPT): Recent Advances and Future Challenges
Ponnimbaduge Perera, T. D., Jayakody, D. N. K., Sharma, S. K., Chatzinotas, S., & Li, J. (2018) · IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials · doi:10.1109/comst.2017.2783901 · Cited by 920
Self-citationA survey of physical layer security techniques for 5g wireless networks and challenges ahead
Wu, Y., Khisti, A., Xiao, C., Caire, G., Wong, K.-K., & Gao, X. (2018) · IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications · doi:10.1109/jsac.2018.2825560 · Cited by 816
DC programming and DCA: thirty years of developments
Le Thi, H. A., & Pham Dinh, T. (2018) · Mathematical Programming · doi:10.1007/s10107-018-1235-y · Cited by 348
Metadata
- Authors
- Zheng, G., Krikidis, I., Li, J., Petropulu, A. P., & Ottersten, B.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing
- Published
- 2013-10
- Volume
- 61
- Issue
- 20
- Pages
- 4962-4974
- ISSN
- 1053-587X (ISSN-L)
- 1941-0476
- OpenAlex
- W2009204314
- Cited by
- 384
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 22.17
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Improving Physical Layer Secrecy Using Full-Duplex Jamming Receivers. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/tsp.2013.2269049
- The paper
- Zheng, G., Krikidis, I., Li, J., Petropulu, A. P., & Ottersten, B. (2013). Improving Physical Layer Secrecy Using Full-Duplex Jamming Receivers. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing. https://doi.org/10.1109/tsp.2013.2269049
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.