Variational Mode Decomposition
Abstract
During the late 1990s, Huang introduced the algorithm called Empirical Mode Decomposition, which is widely used today to recursively decompose a signal into different modes of unknown but separate spectral bands. EMD is known for limitations like sensitivity to noise and sampling. These limitations could only partially be addressed by more mathematical attempts to this decomposition problem, like synchrosqueezing, empirical wavelets or recursive variational decomposition. Here, we propose an entirely non-recursive variational mode decomposition model, where the modes are extracted concurrently. The model looks for an ensemble of modes and their respective center frequencies, such that the modes collectively reproduce the input signal, while each being smooth after demodulation into baseband. In Fourier domain, this corresponds to a narrow-band prior. We show important relations to Wiener filter denoising. Indeed, the proposed method is a generalization of the classic Wiener filter into multiple, adaptive bands. Our model provides a solution to the decomposition problem that is theoretically well founded and still easy to understand. The variational model is efficiently optimized using an alternating direction method of multipliers approach. Preliminary results show attractive performance with respect to existing mode decomposition models. In particular, our proposed model is much more robust to sampling and noise. Finally, we show promising practical decomposition results on…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
VMD decomposes a parent signal into an ensemble of modes and their respective center frequencies.
“VMD decomposes a parent signal into an ensemble of modes and their respective center frequencies.”
From Cognitive Edge Computing–Based Fault Detection and Location Strategy for Active Distribution Networks (2022) · cites this paper as Dragomiretskiy and Zosso (2014)
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 78 · Cited by 9,184
- Authors
- Dragomiretskiy, K., & Zosso, D.
- Affiliations
- University of California, Los Angeles (US)
- ORCID
- Zosso, Dominique
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing
- Published
- 2014-02
- Volume
- 62
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 531-544
- ISSN
- 1053-587X (ISSN-L)
- 1941-0476
- OpenAlex
- W2000982976
- Cited by
- 9,184
- References
- 78
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1340 · 2025: 1605 · 2024: 1492 · 2023: 1269 · 2022: 1074 · 2021: 781 · 2020: 546 · 2019: 470 · 2018: 274 · 2017: 182 · 2016: 101 · 2015: 40 · 2014: 7 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 98.29
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Image and Signal Denoising Methods
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Machine Fault Diagnosis Techniques
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Applied Mathematics › Mathematical Analysis and Transform Methods
- Keywords
- variational mode decomposition, empirical mode decomposition, signal decomposition, alternating direction method of multipliers, demodulation, noise robustness, synchrosqueezing
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review