The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Decomposition by Partial Linearization: Parallel Optimization of Multi-Agent Systems
Open accessAbstract
We propose a novel decomposition framework for the distributed optimization of general nonconvex sum-utility functions arising naturally in the system design of wireless multi-user interfering systems. Our main contributions are i) the development of the first class of (inexact) Jacobi best-response algorithms with provable convergence, where all the users simultaneously and iteratively solve a suitably convexified version of the original sum-utility optimization problem; ii) the derivation of a general dynamic pricing mechanism that provides a unified view of existing pricing schemes that are based, instead, on heuristics; and iii) a framework that can be easily particularized to well-known applications, giving rise to very efficient practical (Jacobi or Gauss-Seidel) algorithms that outperform existing ad hoc methods proposed for very specific problems. Interestingly, our framework contains as special cases well-known gradient algorithms for nonconvex sum-utility problems, and many block-coordinate descent schemes for convex functions.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Shi, Q., Razaviyayn, M., Luo, Z.-Q., & He, C. (2011) · IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing · doi:10.1109/tsp.2011.2147784 · Cited by 2,129
Technical Note—A General Inner Approximation Algorithm for Nonconvex Mathematical Programs
Marks, B. R., & Wright, G. P. (1978) · Operations Research · doi:10.1287/opre.26.4.681 · Cited by 985
Cited by
Majorization-Minimization Algorithms in Signal Processing, Communications, and Machine Learning
Sun, Y., Babu, P., & Palomar, D. P. (2017) · IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing · doi:10.1109/tsp.2016.2601299 · Cited by 1,820
Self-citationNEXT: In-Network Nonconvex Optimization
Lorenzo, P. D., & Scutari, G. (2016) · IEEE Transactions on Signal and Information Processing over Networks · doi:10.1109/tsipn.2016.2524588 · Cited by 473
Self-citationOptimization Methods for Designing Sequences With Low Autocorrelation Sidelobes
Song, J., Babu, P., & Palomar, D. P. (2015) · IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing · doi:10.1109/tsp.2015.2425808 · Cited by 382
Self-citationDC programming and DCA: thirty years of developments
Le Thi, H. A., & Pham Dinh, T. (2018) · Mathematical Programming · doi:10.1007/s10107-018-1235-y · Cited by 348
Distributed nonconvex multiagent optimization over time-varying networks
Sun, Y., Scutari, G., & Palomar, D. (2016) · 2016 50th Asilomar Conference on Signals, Systems and Computers · doi:10.1109/acssc.2016.7869154 · Cited by 86
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Scutari, G., Facchinei, F., Song, P., Palomar, D. P., & Pang, J.-S.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing
- Published
- 2014-02
- Volume
- 62
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 641-656
- ISSN
- 1053-587X (ISSN-L)
- 1941-0476
- OpenAlex
- W1974661392
- Cited by
- 338
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 46.62
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Decomposition by Partial Linearization: Parallel Optimization of Multi-Agent Systems. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/tsp.2013.2293126
- The paper
- Scutari, G., Facchinei, F., Song, P., Palomar, D. P., & Pang, J.-S. (2014). Decomposition by Partial Linearization: Parallel Optimization of Multi-Agent Systems. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing. https://doi.org/10.1109/tsp.2013.2293126
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.