Cited by 666Mathematical Analysis and Transform MethodsAdvanced Graph Neural NetworksSparse and Compressive Sensing Techniques

Discrete Signal Processing on Graphs: Sampling Theory

Open access
Chen, Siheng, Varma, Rohan, Sandryhaila, Aliaksei, Kovacevic, Jelena·2015·IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing

Abstract

We propose a sampling theory for signals that are supported on either directed or undirected graphs. The theory follows the same paradigm as classical sampling theory. We show that perfect recovery is possible for graph signals bandlimited under the graph Fourier transform. The sampled signal coefficients form a new graph signal, whose corresponding graph structure preserves the first-order difference of the original graph signal. For general graphs, an optimal sampling operator based on experimentally designed sampling is proposed to guarantee perfect recovery and robustness to noise; for graphs whose graph Fourier transforms are frames with maximal robustness to erasures as well as for Erdős-Rényi graphs, random sampling leads to perfect recovery with high probability. We further establish the connection to the sampling theory of finite discrete-time signal processing and previous work on signal recovery on graphs. To handle full-band graph signals, we propose a graph filter bank based on sampling theory on graphs. Finally, we apply the proposed sampling theory to semi-supervised classification of online blogs and digit images, where we achieve similar or better performance with fewer labeled samples compared to previous work.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/tsp.2015.2469645

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chen, S., Varma, R., Sandryhaila, A., & Kovacevic, J.
Affiliations
Carnegie Mellon University (US)
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing
Published
2015-12
Volume
63
Issue
24
Pages
6510-6523
ISSN
  • 1053-587X (ISSN-L)
  • 1941-0476
OpenAlex
W2161763921
Cited by
666
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 26 · 2025: 43 · 2024: 56 · 2023: 56 · 2022: 50 · 2021: 69 · 2020: 79 · 2019: 81 · 2018: 83 · 2017: 62 · 2016: 48 · 2015: 13
FWCI
133.51
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • KiltHub Repository (submittedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • KiltHub Repository
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (1130616, 1421919)
  • US Department of Transportation (DTRT12-GUTC11)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Applied Mathematics › Mathematical Analysis and Transform Methods
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Advanced Graph Neural Networks
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Computational Mechanics › Sparse and Compressive Sensing Techniques
Keywords
graph signal processing, sampling theory, graph Fourier transform, band-limited signals, Erdős-Rényi random graphs, random sampling, semi-supervised classification, directed graphs, undirected graphs

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review