Discrete Signal Processing on Graphs: Sampling Theory
Open accessAbstract
We propose a sampling theory for signals that are supported on either directed or undirected graphs. The theory follows the same paradigm as classical sampling theory. We show that perfect recovery is possible for graph signals bandlimited under the graph Fourier transform. The sampled signal coefficients form a new graph signal, whose corresponding graph structure preserves the first-order difference of the original graph signal. For general graphs, an optimal sampling operator based on experimentally designed sampling is proposed to guarantee perfect recovery and robustness to noise; for graphs whose graph Fourier transforms are frames with maximal robustness to erasures as well as for Erdős-Rényi graphs, random sampling leads to perfect recovery with high probability. We further establish the connection to the sampling theory of finite discrete-time signal processing and previous work on signal recovery on graphs. To handle full-band graph signals, we propose a graph filter bank based on sampling theory on graphs. Finally, we apply the proposed sampling theory to semi-supervised classification of online blogs and digit images, where we achieve similar or better performance with fewer labeled samples compared to previous work.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Spectral-based methods assume graphs to be undirected.
“They assume graphs to be undirected.”
From A Comprehensive Survey on Graph Neural Networks (2021) · cites this paper as [84]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Emergence of Scaling in Random Networks
Barabási, A.-L., & Albert, R. (1999) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.286.5439.509 · Cited by 36,135 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
A Comprehensive Survey on Graph Neural Networks
Wu, Z., Pan, S., Chen, F., Long, G., Zhang, C., & Yu, P. S. (2021) · IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems · doi:10.1109/tnnls.2020.2978386 · Cited by 11,000 · see citing works
Explainability Methods for Graph Convolutional Neural Networks
Pope, P. E., Kolouri, S., Rostami, M., Martin, C. E., & Hoffmann, H. (2019) · 2019 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2019.01103 · Cited by 553 · see citing works
Deep learning approaches for similarity computation: A survey
Yang, P., Wang, H., Yang, J., Qian, Z., Zhang, Y., & Lin, X. (2024) · IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering · doi:10.1109/tkde.2024.3422484 · Cited by 28 · see citing works
- Authors
- Chen, S., Varma, R., Sandryhaila, A., & Kovacevic, J.
- Affiliations
- Carnegie Mellon University (US)
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing
- Published
- 2015-12
- Volume
- 63
- Issue
- 24
- Pages
- 6510-6523
- ISSN
- 1053-587X (ISSN-L)
- 1941-0476
- OpenAlex
- W2161763921
- Cited by
- 666
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 26 · 2025: 43 · 2024: 56 · 2023: 56 · 2022: 50 · 2021: 69 · 2020: 79 · 2019: 81 · 2018: 83 · 2017: 62 · 2016: 48 · 2015: 13
- FWCI
- 133.51
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Licence
- Locations
- IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- KiltHub Repository (submittedVersion)
- Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- KiltHub Repository
- Funders
- National Science Foundation (1130616, 1421919)
- US Department of Transportation (DTRT12-GUTC11)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Applied Mathematics › Mathematical Analysis and Transform Methods
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Advanced Graph Neural Networks
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Computational Mechanics › Sparse and Compressive Sensing Techniques
- Keywords
- graph signal processing, sampling theory, graph Fourier transform, band-limited signals, Erdős-Rényi random graphs, random sampling, semi-supervised classification, directed graphs, undirected graphs
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review