The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Nonconvex Demixing From Bilinear Measurements
Open accessAbstract
We consider the problem of demixing a sequence of source signals from the sum of noisy bilinear measurements. It is a generalized mathematical model for blind demixing with blind deconvolution, which is prevalent across the areas of dictionary learning, image processing, and communications. However, state-of-the-art convex methods for blind demixing via semidefinite programming are computationally infeasible for large-scale problems. Although the existing nonconvex algorithms are able to address the scaling issue, they normally require proper regularization to establish optimality guarantees. The additional regularization yields tedious algorithmic parameters and pessimistic convergence rates with conservative step sizes. To address the limitations of exiting methods, we thus develop a provable nonconvex demixing procedure via Wirtinger flow, much like vanilla gradient descent, to harness the benefits of regularization-free fast convergence rate with aggressive step size and computational optimality guarantees. This is achieved by exploiting the benign geometry of the blind demixing problem, thereby revealing that Wirtinger flow enforces the regularization-free iterates in the region of strong convexity and qualified level of smoothness, where the step size can be chosen aggressively.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“The key observation is that blind demixing is able to perform low-latency data decoding for multiple users from the sum of bilinear measurements without channel estimation at both the transmitters and receivers [188], [189].”
From Edge artificial intelligence for 6g: vision, enabling technologies, and applications (2022) · cites this paper as [189]
In the citing paper
“Fortunately, under the high-dimensional statistical setting, the local strong convexity and smoothness of the nonconvex loss functions can be exploited to tame the nonconvexity for various learning models, e.g., blind demixing [189], phase retrieval [254], and shallow neural networks [255].”
From Edge artificial intelligence for 6g: vision, enabling technologies, and applications (2022) · cites this paper as [189]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Theoretical insights into the optimization landscape of over-parameterized shallow neural networksPreprint
Soltanolkotabi, M., Javanmard, A., & Lee, J. D. (2017) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1707.04926 · Cited by 1
Research works printed but not linked: 22
- ma, 0, Implicit regularization in nonconvex statistical estimation: Gradient descent converges linearly for phase retrieval, matrix completion and blind deconvolution, Proc Int Conf Mach Learn, 3345
- 10.1093/imaiai/iau005 · DOI
- 10.1109/TIT.2005.858979 · DOI
- 10.1109/TIT.2016.2598574 · DOI
- 10.1109/TIT.2015.2399924 · DOI
- 10.1002/cpa.21638 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.acha.2018.01.001 · DOI
- bhojanapalli, 0, Global optimality of local search for low rank matrix recovery, Proc Int Conf Neural Inf Process, 3873
- ge, 0, No spurious local minima in nonconvex low rank problems: A unified geometric analysis, Proc Int Conf Mach Learn, 1233
- 10.1109/TIT.2016.2632162 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1109/26.655407 · DOI
- 10.1109/WCNC.2018.8377231 · DOI
- 10.1109/CVPR.2013.57 · DOI
- campisi, 2017, Blind Image Deconvolution Theory and Applications, 10.1201/9781420007299 · DOI
- 10.1093/imaiai/iax022 · DOI
- 10.1109/TIT.2013.2294644 · DOI
- 10.1109/TIT.2017.2784481 · DOI
- 10.1109/TIT.2017.2701342 · DOI
- 10.1007/s10208-014-9191-2 · DOI
- ge, 0, Escaping from saddle points—Online stochastic gradient for tensor decomposition, Proc Conf Learn Theory, 797
- bandeira, 0, On the low-rank approach for semidefinite programs arising in synchronization and community detection, Proc Conf Learn Theory, 361
- 10.1023/A:1022303426500 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Edge artificial intelligence for 6g: vision, enabling technologies, and applications
Letaief, K. B., Shi, Y., Lu, J., & Lu, J. (2022) · IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications · doi:10.1109/jsac.2021.3126076 · Cited by 829
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Dong, J., & Shi, Y.
- Affiliations
- ShanghaiTech University (CN)
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing
- Published
- 2018-10-01
- Volume
- 66
- Issue
- 19
- Pages
- 5152-5166
- ISSN
- 1053-587X (ISSN-L)
- 1941-0476
- OpenAlex
- W2887509927
- Cited by
- 37
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 3
- FWCI
- 5.34
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Funders
- National Natural Science Foundation of China (61601290)
- Shanghai Sailing Program (16YF1407700)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Signal Processing › Sparse and Compressive Sensing Techniques
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Signal Processing › Blind Source Separation Techniques
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Image and Signal Denoising Methods
- Keywords
- non-convex optimization, Wirtinger flow, blind deconvolution, strong convexity
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review