Cited by 116Stochastic Gradient Optimization TechniquesPrivacy-Preserving Technologies in DataDistributed Sensor Networks and Detection Algorithms

High-Dimensional Stochastic Gradient Quantization for Communication-Efficient Edge Learning

Open access
Du, Yuqing, Yang, Sheng, Huang, Kaibin·2020·IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing

Abstract

Edge machine learning involves the deployment of learning algorithms at the wireless network edge so as to leverage massive mobile data for enabling intelligent applications. The mainstream edge learning approach, federated learning, has been developed based on distributed gradient descent. Based on the approach, stochastic gradients are computed at edge devices and then transmitted to an edge server for updating a global AI model. Since each stochastic gradient is typically high-dimensional, communication overhead becomes a bottleneck for edge learning. To address this issue, we propose a novel framework of hierarchical gradient quantization and study its effect on the learning performance. First, the framework features a practical hierarchical architecture for decomposing the stochastic gradient into its norm and normalized block gradients, and efficiently quantizes them using a uniform quantizer and a low-dimensional Grassmannian codebook, respectively. Subsequently, the quantized normalized block gradients are scaled and cascaded to yield the quantized normalized stochastic gradient using a socalled hinge vector, which is compressed using another low-dimensional Grassmannian quantizer designed under the criterion of minimum distortion. The other feature of the framework is a bit-allocation scheme for reducing the distortion, which divides the total quantization bits to determine the resolutions of low-dimensional quantizers. The framework is proved to guarantee model convergency by analyzing the convergence rate as a function of quantization bits. Furthermore, by simulation, our design is shown to substantially reduce the communication overhead compared with the state-of-the-art signSGD scheme, while achieving similar learning accuracies.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/tsp.2020.2983166

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Scalar quantization is a typical way to implement lossy compression for high-dimensional gradient vectors by quantizing each entry to a finite-bit low precision value.

    “Scalar quantization is a typical way to implement lossy compression for the high-dimensional gradient vectors by quantizing each of their entries to a finite-bit low precision value [123]- [125], which was further improved by the recent proposal of vector quantization [126], [127].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 21

  1. R. Tandon, Q. Lei, A. G. Dimakis, and N. Karampatziakis, "Gradient coding: Avoiding stragglers in distributed learning," in Proc. of Intl. Conf. Mach. Learning (ICML), pp. 3368-3376, Jul. 2017.
  2. T. Chen, G. Giannakis, T. Sun, and W. Yin, "LAG: Lazily aggregated gradient for communication-efficient distributed learning," in Proc. of Adv. Neural Inf. Proc. Systems (NIPS), pp. 5050-5060, Dec. 2018.
  3. H. Zhang, J. Li, K. Kara, D. Alistarh, J. Liu, and C. Zhang, "ZIPML: Training linear models with end-to-end low precision, and a little bit of deep learning," in Proc. of the 34th Intl. Conf. Mach. Learning (ICML), pp. 4035-4043, Aug. 2017.
  4. D. Alistarh, D. Grubic, J. Li, R. Tomioka, and M. Vojnovic, "QSGD: Communication-efficient SGD via gradient quantization and encoding," in Proc. of Adv. Neural Inf. Proc. Systems (NIPS), pp. 1709-1720, Dec. 2017.
  5. J. Bernstein, Y.-X. Wang, K. Azizzadenesheli, and A. Anandkumar, "signSGD: Compressed optimisation for non-convex problems," in Proc. of Intl. Conf. Mach. Learning (ICML), vol. 80, pp. 559-568, Jul. 2018.
  6. J. Wu, W. Huang, J. Huang, and T. Zhang, "Error compensated quantized SGD and its applications to large-scale distributed optimization," in Proc. of Intl. Conf. Mach. Learning (ICML), pp. 5321-5329, Jul. 2018.
  7. A. Gersho and R. M. Gray, Vector quantization and signal compression. Springer Science & Business Media, 2012, vol. 159.
  8. D. J. Love, R. W. Heath, Jr, V. K. Lau, D. Gesbert, B. D. Rao, and M. Andrews, "An overview of limited feedback in wireless communication systems," IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun., vol. 26, no. 8, pp. 1341-1365, 2008.
  9. K. K. Mukkavilli, A. Sabharwal, E. Erkip, and B. Aazhang, "On beamforming with finite rate feedback in multiple-antenna systems," IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory, vol. 49, no. 10, pp. 2562-2579, 2003.
  10. D. J. Love, R. W. Heath, Jr, and T. Strohmer, "Grassmannian beamforming for multiple-input multiple-output wireless systems," IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory, vol. 49, no. 10, p. 2735, 2003.
  11. V. Raghavan, R. W. Heath, Jr, and A. M. Sayeed, "Systematic codebook designs for quantized beamforming in correlated MIMO channels," IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun., vol. 25, no. 7, pp. 1298-1310, 2007.
  12. T. Kim, D. J. Love, and B. Clerckx, "MIMO systems with limited rate differential feedback in slowly varying channels," IEEE Trans. Commun., vol. 59, no. 4, pp. 1175-1189, 2011.
  13. K. Huang, R. W. Heath, Jr, and J. G. Andrews, "Limited feedback beamforming over temporally-correlated channels," IEEE Trans. Sig. Process., vol. 57, no. 5, pp. 1959-1975, 2009.
  14. P. Xia and G. B. Giannakis, "Design and analysis of transmit-beamforming based on limited-rate feedback," IEEE Trans. Sig. Process., vol. 54, no. 5, pp. 1853-1863, 2006.
  15. J. Nam, J.-Y. Ahn, A. Adhikary, and G. Caire, "Joint spatial division and multiplexing: Realizing massive MIMO gains with limited channel state information," in Proc. of Annual Conf. Inf. Sciences and Systems (CISS), pp. 1-6, Mar. 2012.
  16. J. Choi, Z. Chance, D. J. Love, and U. Madhow, "Noncoherent trellis coded quantization: A practical limited feedback technique for massive MIMO systems," IEEE Trans. Commun., vol. 61, no. 12, pp. 5016-5029, 2013.
  17. M. S. Sim, J. Park, C.-B. Chae, and R. W. Heath, Jr, "Compressed channel feedback for correlated massive MIMO systems," J. Commun. and Networks, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 95-104, 2016.
  18. I. S. Dhillon, J. R. Heath, T. Strohmer, and J. A. Tropp, "Constructing packings in Grassmannian manifolds via alternating projection," Experimental mathematics, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 9-35, 2008.
  19. V. Lau, Y. Liu, and T.-A. Chen, "On the design of MIMO block-fading channels with feedback-link capacity constraint," IEEE Trans. Commun., vol. 52, no. 1, pp. 62-70, 2004.
  20. J. H. Conway and N. J. A. Sloane, Sphere packings, lattices and groups. Springer Science & Business Media, vol. 290, 2013.
  21. W. Dai, Y. Liu, and B. Rider, "Quantization bounds on Grassmann manifolds and applications to MIMO communications," IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory, vol. 54, no. 3, pp. 1108-1123, 2008.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Du, Y., Yang, S., & Huang, K.
Affiliations
  • University of Hong Kong (HK)
  • Université Paris-Saclay (FR)
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing
Published
2020
Volume
68
Pages
2128-2142
ISSN
  • 1053-587X (ISSN-L)
  • 1941-0476
OpenAlex
W2979495156
Cited by
116
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 25 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 1
FWCI
7.66
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
Hong Kong Research Grants Council (17208319, 17209917)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Stochastic Gradient Optimization Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Distributed Sensor Networks and Detection Algorithms
Keywords
edge machine learning, federated learning, communication efficiency, uniform quantizer, bit allocation, convergence rate, signSGD

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review