Cited by 137Optimal Power Flow DistributionElectric Power System OptimizationPower System Reliability and Maintenance

Probabilistic assessment of hosting capacity in radial distribution systems

Open access
Abad, Mohammad Seydali Seyf, Ma, Jin, Zhang, Diwei, Ahmadyar, Ahmad Shabir, Marzooghi, Hesamoddin·2018·IEEE Transactions on Sustainable Energy

Abstract

High penetration of distributed generation (DG) is mainly constrained by voltage-related issues. Due to the uncertainties associated with type, size, and location of DGs, it is difficult to quantify their integration limits in distribution networks, i.e., hosting capacity (HC). To address this issue, this paper proposes a probabilistic-based framework to determine the maximum integration limits of DGs considering the voltage rise and voltage deviation constraints. Such framework requires the use of the HC model, which can be formulated as a nonlinear optimization problem. Adding the voltage deviation constraint in the HC problem makes the model unsolvable. We address this issue by proposing a two-step algorithm to linearize the HC model. Then, using the linearized model, a probabilistic framework is proposed for considering the load variability and DGs uncertainties. To validate the efficacy and accuracy of the proposed framework, we identify the HC of a balanced and an unbalanced distribution networks and compare our results with those obtained from comprehensive power flow method and the traditional conservative planning. Finally, using the proposed framework, the impact of voltage deviation constraint, load growth, DG type and network structure on the HC are comprehensively studied using different DG technologies (i.e., Photovoltaics and wind).

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/tste.2018.2819201

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Abad, M. S. S., Ma, J., Zhang, D., Ahmadyar, A. S., & Marzooghi, H.
Affiliations
  • The University of Sydney (AU)
  • Central Queensland University (AU)
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Sustainable Energy
Published
2018-10
Volume
9
Issue
4
Pages
1935-1947
ISSN
  • 1949-3029 (ISSN-L)
  • 1949-3037
OpenAlex
W2793352959
Cited by
137
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 23 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 5
FWCI
5.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • IEEE Transactions on Sustainable Energy (publishedVersion)
  • Acquire (CQUniversity) (submittedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • Faculty of Engineering
  • IT Mid-Career Research Development Scheme
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Optimal Power Flow Distribution
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Electric Power System Optimization
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality › Power System Reliability and Maintenance
Keywords
hosting capacity, radial distribution systems, distributed generation integration, probabilistic analysis, load variation, unbalanced distribution systems, photovoltaics, wind energy, distribution network planning

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review