Cited by 23Cardiovascular Function and Risk FactorsMedical Image Segmentation TechniquesCardiac Imaging and Diagnostics

Realtime Automatic Assessment of Cardiac Function in Echocardiography

Storve, Sigurd, Grue, Jahn Frederik, Samstad, Stein, Dalen, Havard, Haugen, Bjorn Olav, Torp, Hans·2016·IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics, and Frequency Control

Abstract

Assessment of cardiac function by echocardiography is challenging for nonexperts. In a patient with dyspnea, quantification of the mitral annular excursion (MAE) and velocities is important for the diagnosis of heart failure. The displacement of the atrioventricular (AV) plane is a good indicator of systolic left ventricular function, while the peak velocities give supplementary information about the systolic and diastolic function. By measuring these parameters automatically, a preliminary diagnosis can be given by the nonexpert. We propose an automatic algorithm to localize the mitral annular points in an apical four-chamber view and estimate the MAE, as well as the systolic, early diastolic, and late diastolic tissue peak velocities, by using a deformable ventricle model for orientation and tissue Doppler data for tracking. Automatic parameter estimates from 367 tissue Doppler recordings were compared to reference measurements by experienced cardiologists to assess the accuracy of the estimation, as well as the ability to correctly detect reduced MAE, which we defined as less than 10 mm. The dataset consisted of 200 recordings from a patient population and 167 healthy from a population study. When considering the average of the septal and lateral values, the estimation error for the MAE had a standard deviation of 2.1 mm, which was reduced to 1.9 mm when excluding recordings for which the automatic segmentation failed to locate the AV plane (41 recordings). The corresponding standard deviations for the peak velocities were around 1 cm/s. The classification of MAE was correct in 90% of the cases and had a sensitivity of 83% and a specificity of 92%. We conclude that the algorithm has good accuracy and note that the estimation error for the MAE was comparable to interobserver and methodology agreements reported in the literature.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/tuffc.2016.2518306

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 20 · Cited by 23

Authors
Storve, S., Grue, J. F., Samstad, S., Dalen, H., Haugen, B. O., & Torp, H.
Affiliations
Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NO)
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics, and Frequency Control
Published
2016-03
Volume
63
Issue
3
Pages
358-368
ISSN
0885-3010 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2293286242
Cited by
23
References
20
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 2 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1
FWCI
1.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
The Research Council of Norway (219282)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Medical Image Segmentation Techniques
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics
Keywords
mitral annular velocity, tissue Doppler imaging, left ventricular function, systolic function, diastolic function, automatic segmentation, heart failure diagnosis, apical four-chamber view
MeSH terms
Algorithms, Heart, Humans, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Sensitivity and Specificity, Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted, Echocardiography, Doppler

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review